ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2022
Effect of manipulation technique using ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block on range of motion at the shoulder joint in frozen shoulder: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced manipulation technique for ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block to improve shoulder external rotation in frozen shoulder: a retrospective study.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2026Article
- Anatomical variation of cervical nerve roots not passing through the scalene muscle plane.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2026Article
- Article
- Satisfaction of patients with frozen shoulder following silent manipulation: a prospective observation study.Scientific reports · 2024Observational
- Inferior glenohumeral joint capsule thickness in frozen shoulder via ultrasonography.JSES international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the range of motion (ROM) at the shoulder joint before and after silent manipulation.
methodsThis retrospective study included all patients who underwent silent manipulation at our institution between January 2013 and December 2017. In total, 1,665 shoulders in 1,610 patients (519 men, 1,146 women; mean age 55.4 ± 8.8 years) were treated during the study period. The mean symptom duration was 6.6 ± 7.1 months. ROM at the shoulder joint was measured in flexion, abduction, and external rotation before silent manipulation and at 1 week and 1, 2, and 3 months after the procedure.
resultsMean ROM at the shoulder was 98.8° (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.9-99.8) before silent manipulation and 155.5° (154.1-156.8) after 3 months in flexion (p = 0.0000), 75.6° (74.5-76.8) and 152.9° (151.0-154.9), respectively, in abduction (p = 0.0000), and 12.7° (12.0-13.4) and 45.9° (44.4-47.4) in external rotation (p = 0.0000). All ROM values were significantly increased at all time points after the procedure. There were no unanticipated adverse events or serious adverse reactions.
conclusionsThis study reports on the efficacy and safety of manipulation using conduction anesthesia for shoulder contractures in a large group of patients. Silent manipulation can increase ROM at the shoulder safely and effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.