Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35792925›Full record

ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Clinical and economic value of oral nutrition supplements in patients with cancer: a position paper from the Survivorship Care and Nutritional Support Working Group of Alliance Against Cancer.

Riccardo Caccialanza, Alessandro Laviano, Cristina Bosetti, Mariateresa Nardi, Valentina Casalone, Lucilla Titta, Roberto Mele, Giovanni De Pergola, Francesco De Lorenzo, Paolo Pedrazzoli and 1 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Riccardo CaccialanzaClinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Viale Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy. r.caccialanza@smatteo.pv.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9379-3569
Alessandro LavianoDepartment of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Cristina BosettiUnit of Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Mariateresa NardiNutritional Support Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Valentina CasaloneClinical Nutrition and Dietetics Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Turin, Italy.
Lucilla TittaDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Roberto MeleHospital Health Direction, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni De PergolaUnit of Geriatrics and Internal Medicine, National Institute of Gastroenterology "Saverio de Bellis" Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy.
Francesco De LorenzoItalian Federation of Volunteer-Based Cancer Organizations, Rome, Italy.
Paolo PedrazzoliMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Alliance Against Cancer (ACC) Survivorship Care, Nutritional Support Working Group
Candiolo Cancer Institute · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITGastroenterology Hospital "Saverio de Bellis" · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malnutrition is a common clinical and public health problem that can frequently affect patients in hospital and community settings. In particular, cancer-related malnutrition results from a combination of metabolic dysregulation and anorexia, caused both by the tumor itself and by its treatment. Patients with head-neck cancer, or with gastroesophageal, pancreatic, lung, and colorectal cancer, are particularly at risk of developing malnutrition, with a prevalence varying between 30 and 50% depending on tumor location and anti-cancer treatment complications. Prevention and adequate management of malnutrition is now considered an essential key point of therapeutic pathways of patients with cancer, with the aim to enhance their quality of life, reduce complications, and improve clinical outcomes. Oral nutritional supplements (ONS) are part of the nutritional therapy and represent an effective tool to address cancer-related malnutrition, as supported by growing literature data. However, patients' access to ONS - which is regulated by different national and regional policies in terms of reimbursement - is quite heterogeneous. This narrative review aims to summarize the current knowledge about the role of ONS in terms of cost-effectiveness in the management of actively treated patients with cancer, following surgery and/or radiotherapy/chemotherapy treatment and to present the position on this issue of the Alliance Against Cancer, the Italian National Oncology Network, coming up from a focused virtual roundtable of the Survivorship Care and Nutritional Support Working Group.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMalnutritionDietary SupplementsHumansNutritional StatusNutritional SupportQuality of LifeSurvivorshipCancer treatmentCost-effectivenessMalnutritionNutritional supportOral nutrition supplementsPatients with cancer

Identifiers

PMID35792925
OpenAlexW4283831264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.