Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35792917›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Hearing rehabilitation for unilateral deafness using a cochlear implant: the influence of the subjective duration of deafness on speech intelligibility.

Tobias Rader, Oliver Julian Waleka, Sebastian Strieth, Klaus Wolfgang Georg Eichhorn, Andrea Bohnert, Dimitrios Koutsimpelas, Christoph Matthias, Benjamin Philipp Ernst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tobias RaderDivision of Audiology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Medical Center, Munich, Germany. tobias.rader@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7250-2833
Oliver Julian WalekaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Sebastian StriethDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Klaus Wolfgang Georg EichhornDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany.
Andrea BohnertDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Dimitrios KoutsimpelasDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph MatthiasDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Benjamin Philipp ErnstDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with single sided deafness (SSD) or severe asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (ASHL), cochlear implantation remains the only solution to restore bilateral hearing capacity. Prognostically, the duration of hearing loss in terms of audiological outcome is not yet clear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the influence of subjective deafness duration on postoperative speech perception after cochlear implantation for SSD as well as its impact on quality of life. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe present study included a total of 36 adults aged 50.2 ± 15.5 years who underwent CI for SSD/ASHL at our clinic between 2010 and 2015. Patients were audiometrically assessed at 3 and 12-36 months postoperatively. Test results were correlated with self-reported duration of deafness. Quality of life was assessed by questionnaire.

resultsMean duration of deafness was 193.9 ± 185.7 months. The side-separated hearing threshold showed an averaged target range between 30 and 40 dB HL. Freiburg monosyllable test increased from 0% pre-operatively to 20% after 3 months (p = 0.001) and to 50% after 12-36 months (p = 0.002). There was a significant correlation between audiometric outcome and subjective deafness duration at 12-36 months postoperatively (r = - 0.564; p = 0.02) with a cutoff for open-set monosyllable recognition at a duration of deafness of greater than 408 months. Quality of life was significantly improved by CI.

conclusionsCI implantation in unilaterally deafened patients provides objective and subjective benefits. Duration of deafness is unlikely to be an independent negative predictive factor and thus should not generally be considered as contraindication.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessHearing Loss, SensorineuralHearing Loss, UnilateralSpeech PerceptionAdultHearingHumansQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSpeech IntelligibilityTreatment OutcomeCochlear implantDuration of deafnessHearing rehabilitationQuestionnaireSingle sided deafness

Identifiers

PMID35792917
PMCPMC9849293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.