Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35792866›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Biological Misinterpretation of Transcriptional Signatures in Tumor Samples Can Unknowingly Undermine Mechanistic Understanding and Faithful Alignment with Preclinical Data.

Natalie C Fisher, Ryan M Byrne, Holly Leslie, Colin Wood, Assya Legrini, Andrew J Cameron, Baharak Ahmaderaghi, Shania M Corry, Sudhir B Malla, Raheleh Amirkhah and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalie C Fisher *The Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1769-7468
Ryan M Byrne *The Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6505-6345
Holly LeslieWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Colin WoodWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Assya LegriniWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Andrew J CameronWolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7065-9033
Baharak AhmaderaghiSchool of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4166-6290
Shania M CorryThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Sudhir B MallaThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5862-3815
Raheleh AmirkhahThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3494-271X
Aoife J McCooeyThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Emily RoganThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Keara L RedmondThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Svetlana SakhnevychThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Enric DomingoUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4390-8767
James JacksonInformation Services, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Maurice B LoughreyThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Simon LeedhamUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1476-6982
Tim MaughanUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0580-5065
Mark LawlerThe Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3930-8470
Owen J SansomCancer Research UK Beatson Institute, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9540-3010
Felicity LamrockSchool of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8395-2415
Viktor H KoelzerDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University and University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9206-4885
Nigel B Jamieson *Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9552-4725
Philip D Dunne *The Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9160-283X
Queen's University Belfast · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBCancer Research UK Scotland Institute · GBUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29834Cancer Research UK A25142Cancer Research UK A26825Cancer Research UK A28223Cancer Research UK A29834Cancer Research UK C55370/A25813Medical Research Council MC_PC_21042Medical Research Council MR/M016587/1Medical Research Council MR/V029711/1Swiss National Science Foundation 168322Wellcome Trust 206314/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrecise mechanism-based gene expression signatures (GES) have been developed in appropriate in vitro and in vivo model systems, to identify important cancer-related signaling processes. However, some GESs originally developed to represent specific disease processes, primarily with an epithelial cell focus, are being applied to heterogeneous tumor samples where the expression of the genes in the signature may no longer be epithelial-specific. Therefore, unknowingly, even small changes in tumor stroma percentage can directly influence GESs, undermining the intended mechanistic signaling. EXPERIMENTAL

designUsing colorectal cancer as an exemplar, we deployed numerous orthogonal profiling methodologies, including laser capture microdissection, flow cytometry, bulk and multiregional biopsy clinical samples, single-cell RNA sequencing and finally spatial transcriptomics, to perform a comprehensive assessment of the potential for the most widely used GESs to be influenced, or confounded, by stromal content in tumor tissue. To complement this work, we generated a freely-available resource, ConfoundR; https://confoundr.qub.ac.uk/, that enables users to test the extent of stromal influence on an unlimited number of the genes/signatures simultaneously across colorectal, breast, pancreatic, ovarian and prostate cancer datasets.

resultsFindings presented here demonstrate the clear potential for misinterpretation of the meaning of GESs, due to widespread stromal influences, which in-turn can undermine faithful alignment between clinical samples and preclinical data/models, particularly cell lines and organoids, or tumor models not fully recapitulating the stromal and immune microenvironment.

conclusionsEfforts to faithfully align preclinical models of disease using phenotypically-designed GESs must ensure that the signatures themselves remain representative of the same biology when applied to clinical samples.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleStromal CellsTranscriptomeTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID35792866
PMCPMC9475248
OpenAlexW4283830211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.