Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35792810›Full record

ArticleNano letters2022

Single-Molecule Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Using Wide-Field and Confocal-Laser Scanning Microscopy: A Comparative Analysis.

Nazar Oleksiievets, Christeena Mathew, Jan Christoph Thiele, José Ignacio Gallea, Oleksii Nevskyi, Ingo Gregor, André Weber, Roman Tsukanov, Jörg Enderlein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nano letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nazar OleksiievetsIII. Institute of Physics - Biophysics, Georg August University, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Christeena MathewLaboratory of Supramolecular Chemistry, EPFL SB ISIC LCS, BCH 3307, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jan Christoph ThieleIII. Institute of Physics - Biophysics, Georg August University, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6638-6298
José Ignacio GalleaIII. Institute of Physics - Biophysics, Georg August University, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Oleksii NevskyiIII. Institute of Physics - Biophysics, Georg August University, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2893-481X
Ingo GregorIII. Institute of Physics - Biophysics, Georg August University, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1775-2159
André WeberCombinatorial NeuroImaging Core Facility, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Brenneckestraße 6, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7752-2112
Roman TsukanovIII. Institute of Physics - Biophysics, Georg August University, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3967-1755
Jörg EnderleinIII. Institute of Physics - Biophysics, Georg August University, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5091-7157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent addition to the toolbox of super-resolution microscopy methods is fluorescence-lifetime single-molecule localization microscopy (FL-SMLM). The synergy of SMLM and fluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) combines superior image resolution with lifetime information and can be realized using two complementary experimental approaches: confocal-laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) or wide-field microscopy. Here, we systematically and comprehensively compare these two novel FL-SMLM approaches in different spectral regions. For wide-field FL-SMLM, we use a commercial lifetime camera, and for CLSM-based FL-SMLM we employ a home-built system equipped with a rapid scan unit and a single-photon detector. We characterize the performances of the two systems in localizing single emitters in 3D by combining FL-SMLM with metal-induced energy transfer (MIET) for localization along the third dimension and in the lifetime-based multiplexed bioimaging using DNA-PAINT. Finally, we discuss advantages and disadvantages of wide-field and confocal FL-SMLM and provide practical advice on rational FL-SMLM experiment design.

Indexed as

DNASingle Molecule ImagingMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceNanotechnologyDNADNA-PAINTfluorescence lifetimefluorescence lifetime imaging microscopymetal-induced energy transfersingle-molecule localization microscopysuper-resolution microscopy

Identifiers

PMID35792810
PMCPMC9373986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.