Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35792660›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2023

Severity of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection in Pregnancy in Ontario: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

Kiera R Murison, Alicia A Grima, Alison E Simmons, Ashleigh R Tuite, David N Fisman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kiera R MurisonDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alicia A GrimaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alison E SimmonsDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ashleigh R TuiteDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David N FismanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Public Health Ontario · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAPublic Health Agency of Canada · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy represents a physiological state associated with increased vulnerability to severe outcomes from infectious diseases, both for the pregnant person and developing infant. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic may have important health consequences for pregnant individuals, who may also be more reluctant than nonpregnant people to accept vaccination.

methodsWe sought to estimate the degree to which increased severity of SARS-CoV-2 outcomes can be attributed to pregnancy using a population-based SARS-CoV-2 case file from Ontario, Canada. Because of varying propensity to receive vaccination, and changes in dominant circulating viral strains over time, a time-matched cohort study was performed to evaluate the relative risk of severe illness in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 compared to other SARS-CoV-2 infected women of childbearing age (10-49 years old). Risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 outcomes was evaluated in pregnant women and time-matched nonpregnant controls using multivariable conditional logistic regression.

resultsCompared with the rest of the population, nonpregnant women of childbearing age had an elevated risk of infection (standardized morbidity ratio, 1.28), whereas risk of infection was reduced among pregnant women (standardized morbidity ratio, 0.43). After adjustment for confounding, pregnant women had a markedly elevated risk of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio, 4.96; 95% confidence interval, 3.86-6.37) and intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio, 6.58; 95% confidence interval, 3.29-13.18). The relative increase in hospitalization risk associated with pregnancy was greater in women without comorbidities than in those with comorbidities (P for heterogeneity, .004).

conclusionsGiven the safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pregnancy, risk-benefit calculus strongly favors SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnant women.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousAdolescentAdultChildCohort StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19epidemiologyoutcomespregnancyrespiratory diseaseSARS coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID35792660
PMCPMC9907552
OpenAlexW4283833748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.