Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35792649›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pathology2022

Feasibility of whole-genome sequencing-based tumor diagnostics in routine pathology practice.

Kris G Samsom, Luuk J Schipper, Paul Roepman, Linda Jw Bosch, Ferry Lalezari, Elisabeth G Klompenhouwer, Adrianus J de Langen, Tineke E Buffart, Immy Riethorst, Lieke Schoenmaker and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Ultra-Rapid Droplet Digital PCR Enables Intraoperative Tumor Quantification.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kris G SamsomDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Luuk J SchipperDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul RoepmanHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Linda Jw BoschDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ferry LalezariDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elisabeth G KlompenhouwerDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Adrianus J de LangenDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tineke E BuffartDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Immy RiethorstHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lieke SchoenmakerHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daoin SchoutDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent van der NoortDepartment of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jose G van den BergDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ewart de BruijnHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacobus Jm van der HoevenHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hans van SnellenbergHartwig Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lizet E van der KolkFamily Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Edwin CuppenOncode Institute, Office Jaarbeurs Innovation Mile (JIM), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Emile E VoestDepartment of Molecular Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerrit A MeijerDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0330-3130
Kim MonkhorstDepartment of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLHartwig Medical Foundation · NLDutch Cancer Society · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current increase in number and diversity of targeted anticancer agents poses challenges to the logistics and timeliness of molecular diagnostics (MolDx), resulting in underdiagnosis and treatment. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) may provide a sustainable solution for addressing current as well as future diagnostic challenges. The present study therefore aimed to prospectively assess feasibility, validity, and value of WGS in routine clinical practice. WGS was conducted independently of, and in parallel with, standard of care (SOC) diagnostics on routinely obtained tumor samples from 1,200 consecutive patients with metastatic cancer. Results from both tests were compared and discussed in a dedicated tumor board. From 1,200 patients, 1,302 samples were obtained, of which 1,216 contained tumor cells. WGS was successful in 70% (854/1,216) of samples with a median turnaround time of 11 days. Low tumor purity (<20%) was the main reason for not completing WGS. WGS identified 99.2% and SOC MolDx 99.7% of the total of 896 biomarkers found in genomic regions covered by both tests. Actionable biomarkers were found in 603/848 patients (71%). Of the 936 associated therapy options identified by WGS, 343 were identified with SOC MolDx (36.6%). Biomarker-based therapy was started in 147 patients. WGS revealed 49 not previously identified pathogenic germline variants. Fresh-frozen, instead of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded, sample logistics were easily adopted as experienced by the professionals involved. WGS for patients with metastatic cancer is well feasible in routine clinical practice, successfully yielding comprehensive genomic profiling for the vast majority of patients. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesGenomicsHumansUnited KingdomWhole Genome SequencingcancerdiagnosticsDNA sequencingprecision oncologywhole genome sequencing Biomarker

Identifiers

PMID35792649
PMCPMC9546477
OpenAlexW4283838080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.