Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35792515›Full record

ArticleEcology2022

The potential and realized foraging movements of bees are differentially determined by body size and sociality.

Liam K Kendall, John M Mola, Zachary M Portman, Daniel P Cariveau, Henrik G Smith, Ignasi Bartomeus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bees feeling the burn.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Bug roads: Modeling the green space connectivity and pollinator habitat in a large city using open GIS data and tools.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liam K KendallCentre for Environmental and Climate Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0671-0121
John M MolaU.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5394-9071
Zachary M PortmanDepartment of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-8196
Daniel P CariveauDepartment of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3064-0071
Henrik G SmithCentre for Environmental and Climate Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ignasi BartomeusEstación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7893-4389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reversing biodiversity declines requires a better understanding of organismal mobility, as movement processes dictate the scale at which species interact with the environment. Previous studies have demonstrated that species foraging ranges, and therefore, habitat use increases with body size. Yet, foraging ranges are also affected by other life-history traits, such as sociality, which influence the need of and ability to detect resources. We evaluated the effect of body size and sociality on potential and realized foraging ranges using a compiled dataset of 383 measurements for 81 bee species. Potential ranges were larger than realized ranges and increased more steeply with body size. Highly eusocial species had larger realized foraging ranges than primitively eusocial or solitary taxa. We contend that potential ranges describe species movement capabilities, whereas realized ranges depict how foraging movements result from interactions between species traits and environmental conditions. Furthermore, the complex communication strategies and large colony sizes in highly eusocial species may facilitate foraging over wider areas in response to resource depletion. Our findings should contribute to a greater understanding of landscape ecology and conservation, as traits that influence movement mediate species vulnerability to habitat loss and fragmentation.

Indexed as

Appetitive BehaviorBeesBody SizeSocial BehaviorAnimalsBiodiversityEcologyEcosystemallometryAnthophilacentral place foragingmovement ecologypollinator conservation

Identifiers

PMID35792515
PMCPMC9786665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.