Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35792058›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2022

Adult smokers' discussions about vaping with health professionals and subsequent behavior change: a cohort study.

Yoo Jin Cho, James F Thrasher, Shannon Gravely, Anthony Alberg, Ron Borland, Hua-Hie Yong, K Michael Cummings, Sara C Hitchman, Geoffrey T Fong

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Yoo Jin ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9590-9206
James F ThrasherDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Shannon GravelyDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5224-9105
Anthony AlbergDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Ron BorlandCancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0059-178X
Hua-Hie YongSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8167-6173
K Michael CummingsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-7017
Sara C HitchmanDepartment of Communication and Media Research, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Geoffrey T FongDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
University of South Carolina · USDeakin University · AUMedical University of South Carolina · USOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Waterloo · CAUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Vaporized Nicotine Product Initiation Among Youth in the US, Canada, and England: Methods to Predict Uptake and Policy EfficacyP01CA200512 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FONG, GEOFFREY T · 2016 to 2025
$25.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA200512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo measure the prevalence and changes in smokers' discussions with health professionals (HPs) about nicotine vaping products (NVPs) and HPs' recommendations about NVPs between 2016 and 2020, and their associations with tobacco product use transitions.

designCohort study using multinomial logistic regression analyses on data from waves 1 (2016), 2 (2018) and 3 (2020) from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys.

settingFour countries with varying NVP regulatory environments: 'most restrictive' (Australia), 'somewhat restrictive' (Canada) and 'less restrictive' (England and the United States).

participantsAdult exclusive daily smokers who did not report NVP use at the time of their baseline survey and had visited a HP in the last 12-24 months. Prevalence data came from 4125, 4503 and 4277 respondents, respectively, for each year. Longitudinal data were from 4859 respondents who participated in at least two consecutive surveys. MEASUREMENTS: Prevalence of self-reported discussions with HPs and recommendations from HPs about NVPs. Longitudinal transitions from smoking to vaping (either exclusively or concurrently with smoking) and quitting (regardless of NVP uptake).

findingsThe prevalence of NVP discussions was low among countries with varying regulatory environments and study waves (range = 1.4-6.2%). In 2020, a low percentage of smokers who discussed NVPs with a HP reported that their HPs recommended they use NVPs in the United States (14.7%), Australia (20.2%), Canada (25.7%), with a higher percentage in England (55.7%) where clinical guidelines for smoking cessation include NVPs. Compared with 12.0% of smokers who reported no discussion, 37.0% of those whose HPs recommended NVPs transitioned to vaping at follow-up. Transition to quitting was 9.6% with HPs' recommendation of NVPs versus 13.5% without discussion, a non-significant difference.

conclusionsIn Australia, Canada, England and the United States between 2016 and 2020, health professionals' discussions with smokers about nicotine vaping products (NVPs) were infrequent. NVP discussions were associated with NVP uptake, but not with quitting smoking.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsSmoking CessationVapingAdultCohort StudiesHumansNicotineSmokersSmokingUnited StatesNicotineCigarette smokingE-cigaretteshealth communicationhealth educationhealth policyhealth professionalhealth promotionsmoking cessationvaping

Identifiers

PMID35792058
PMCPMC10964167
OpenAlexW4283838207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.