ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2022
The impact of policy changes from the perspective of providers of family planning care in the US: results from a qualitative study.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- 'So easy to destroy, so hard to build': understanding impacts of federal rule changes on the Title X program, 2018-2024.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Implementing Title X: policy design, administration, and geographic access to care.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Declines in HIV testing and diagnoses: a policy analysis of the 2019 Title X federal regulations on family planning clinics.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Effects of theSexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Title X Policy Shifts and Michigan's Reproductive Health Safety Net.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Improving Access to Contraception Care at a Local Nonprofit Clinic: A Quality Improvement Project.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2025Article
- Provision of DMPA-SC for self-administration in different practice settings during the COVID-19 pandemic: Data from providers across the United States.Contraception · 2024Article
- Early national trends in non-abortion reproductive care access afterFrontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Patient's experience and satisfaction with self-administered subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate use during the first year of COVID-19.Contraception · 2023Article
- Changes in the Frequency and Type of Barriers to Reproductive Health Care Between 2017 and 2021.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on publicly supported clinics providing contraceptive services in four US states.Contraception: X · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, there have been several state and federal policies that have disrupted access to publicly supported family planning care in the United States, including the 2019 rule that altered the federal Title X family planning program. In late 2020, we conducted in-depth interviews with health care providers from 55 facilities providing family planning care in Arizona, Iowa, and Wisconsin with the aim of learning how sites were affected by policy changes. We identified perceived effects on clinic finances, patient confidentiality, contraceptive counselling and service provision, and options counselling resulting from state and federal policy changes. Some clinics lost funding and had to pass some of the cost of services on to patients, raising new confidentiality concerns and creating new burdens on staff to carry out financial counselling with patients. Other sites had to grapple with restrictions on the pregnancy options counselling that they could provide, concentrate counselling on fertility awareness-based methods, and increase efforts to include parents/guardians in the care of adolescent patients. State and federal policies impact how publicly supported family planning care is provided, and compromise efforts to provide patient-centred care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.