ArticleTrends in hearing
Binaural-cue Weighting and Training-Induced Reweighting Across Frequencies.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interactions of Interaural Time and Level Differences in Spatial Hearing with Cochlear Implants.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Binaural-cue reweighting induced by discrimination training.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Lateralization of interaural time differences with mixed rates of stimulation in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Article
- Enhancing Externalization of Frontal Virtual Sound Sources in Binaural Synthesis via Level and Reflection Adjustment of Non-individualized BRIRs.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During sound lateralization, the information provided by interaural differences in time (ITD) and level (ILD) is weighted, with ITDs and ILDs dominating for low and high frequencies, respectively. For mid frequencies, the weighting between these binaural cues can be changed via training. The present study investigated whether binaural-cue weights change gradually with increasing frequency region, whether they can be changed in various frequency regions, and whether such binaural-cue reweighting generalizes to untrained frequencies. In two experiments, a total of 39 participants lateralized 500-ms, 1/3-octave-wide noise bursts containing various ITD/ILD combinations in a virtual audio-visual environment. Binaural-cue weights were measured before and after a 2-session training in which, depending on the group, either ITDs or ILDs were visually reinforced. In experiment 1, four frequency bands (centered at 1000, 1587, 2520, and 4000 Hz) and a multiband stimulus comprising all four bands were presented during weight measurements. During training, only the 1000-, 2520-, and 4000-Hz bands were presented. In experiment 2, the weight measurements only included the two mid-frequency bands, while the training only included the 1587-Hz band. ILD weights increased gradually from low- to high-frequency bands. When ILDs were reinforced during training, they increased for the 4000- (experiment 1) and 2520-Hz band (experiment 2). When ITDs were reinforced, ITD weights increased only for the 1587-Hz band (at specific azimuths). This suggests that ILD reweighting requires high, and ITD reweighting requires low frequencies without including frequency regions providing fine-structure ITD cues. The changes in binaural-cue weights were independent of the trained bands, suggesting some generalization of binaural-cue reweighting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.