Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35791612›Full record

ArticleEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2022

Towards identifying a method of screening for autism amongst women with restrictive eating disorders.

James Adamson, Janina Brede, Charli Babb, Lucy Serpell, Catherine R G Jones, John Fox, Will Mandy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Towards identifying a method of screening for autism amongst women with restrictive eating disorders.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

James AdamsonResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1153-9680
Janina BredeResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Charli BabbSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Lucy SerpellResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Catherine R G JonesSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
John FoxSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3039-8024
Will MandyResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3564-5808
Cardiff University · GBUniversity College London · GBNorth East London NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUp to 37% of patients with anorexia nervosa score above cut-off on autism screening measures. These individuals typically have poorer outcomes from standard eating disorder interventions and could therefore benefit from adaptations. Accurately identifying these individuals is important for improving autism referral processes and clinical pathway decisions. This study's aim was to identify subscales of questionnaires measuring constructs associated with either autism or eating disorders that, when combined with traditional autism screening measures, would improve the ability to identify women with restrictive eating disorders who might benefit from a full autism assessment.

methodOne hundred and sixty women with restrictive eating disorders, with (n = 42) or without (n = 118) an autism diagnosis completed a battery of questionnaires. Using conditional stepwise binary logistic regression, we attempted to improve the autism spectrum quotient 10 item's (AQ-10) ability to discriminate between autistic and non-autistic women in a restrictive eating disorder sample.

resultsIn a binary logistic regression model, the AQ-10 reliably discriminated between autistic and non-autistic women with an accuracy rate of 85% but had relatively low (69%) sensitivity, reflecting a high rate of false negatives. Adding three subscales to the model (Glasgow Sensory Questionnaire Auditory, Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire Compensation and Toronto Alexithymia Scale Externally Orientated Thinking) significantly improved its differentiating ability (accuracy = 88%, sensitivity = 76%, specificity = 92%).

conclusionsWe have identified three subscales that, when used in combination with the AQ-10, may help clinicians understand the pattern of autistic traits in their patients with a restrictive eating disorder. This can inform clinical decisions about whether to refer for a full autism assessment and whether to adapt standard eating disorder treatments to accommodate autistic traits. Future studies are needed to test the model in samples where participants have undergone a full autism assessment.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaAutism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderFeeding and Eating DisordersAffective SymptomsFemaleHumansSurveys and Questionnairesanorexia nervosaautismautism spectrum disordereating disordersscreening

Identifiers

PMID35791612
PMCPMC9540024
OpenAlexW4283827804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.