Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35791428›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2022

Effectiveness of CoronaVac and BNT162b2 COVID-19 mass vaccination in Colombia: A population-based cohort study.

Angel Paternina-Caicedo, Mark Jit, Nelson Alvis-Guzmán, Juan Carlos Fernández, José Hernández, Justo Jesus Paz-Wilches, José Rojas-Suarez, Carmelo Dueñas-Castell, Nelson J Alvis-Zakzuk, Adrian D Smith and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. COVID-19 Vaccines: An Updated Overview of Different Platforms.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Angel Paternina-CaicedoUniversidad del Sinú, Cartagena, Colombia.
Mark JitLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Nelson Alvis-GuzmánUniversidad de Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia.
Juan Carlos FernándezMutual Ser, Cartagena, Colombia.
José HernándezMutual Ser, Cartagena, Colombia.
Justo Jesus Paz-WilchesMutual Ser, Cartagena, Colombia.
José Rojas-SuarezUniversidad de Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia.
Carmelo Dueñas-CastellUniversidad de Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia.
Nelson J Alvis-ZakzukUniversidad de la Costa - CUC, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Adrian D SmithUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Fernando De La Hoz-RestrepoUniversidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Science and Technology Corporation for Naval, Maritime and Riverine Industry Development · COUniversity of Cartagena · COLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversidad del Sinú · COUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · COUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In February 2021, Colombia began mass vaccination against COVID-19 using mainly BNT162b2 and CoronaVac vaccines. We aimed to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) to prevent COVID-19 symptomatic cases, hospitalization, critical care admission, and deaths in a cohort of 796,072 insured subjects older than 40 years in northern Colombia, a setting with a high SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Methods: We identified individuals vaccinated between March 1st of 2021 and August 15th of 2021. We included symptomatic cases, hospitalizations, critical care admissions, and deaths in patients with confirmed COVID-19 as main outcomes. We calculated VE for each outcome from the hazard ratio in Cox proportionally hazards regressions (adjusted by age, sex, place of residence, diabetes, human immunodeficiency virus, cancer, hypertension, tuberculosis, neurological diseases, and chronic renal disease), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Findings: A total of 719,735 insured participants of 40 and more years were followed. We found 21,545 laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 among unvaccinated population, along with 2874 hospitalizations, 1061 critical care admissions, and 1329 deaths, for a rate of 207.2 per million person-days, 27.1 per million person-days, 10.0 per million person-days, and 12.5 per million person-days, respectively. We found CoronaVac was not effective for any outcome in subjects above 80 years old; but for people 40-79 years of age, we found two doses of CoronaVac reduced hospitalization (33.1%; 95% CI, 14.5-47.7), critical care admission (47.2%; 95% CI, 18.5-65.8), and death (55.7%; 95% CI, 32.5-70.0). We found BNT162b2 was effective for all outcomes in the entire population of subjects above 40 years of age, significantly declining for subjects ≥80 years. Interpretation: Two doses of either CoronaVac in population between 40 and 79 years of age, or BNT162b2 among vaccinated above 40 years old significantly reduced deaths of confirmed COVID-19 in a cohort of individuals from Colombia. Vaccine effectiveness for CoronaVac and BNT162b2 declined with increasing age. Funding: UK National Institute for Health Research, the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Covid-19MortalityVaccine effectivenessVaccines

Identifiers

PMID35791428
PMCPMC9246705
OpenAlexW4283748966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.