Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35791335›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2022

Observed protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection following a primary infection: A Danish cohort study among unvaccinated using two years of nationwide PCR-test data.

Daniela Michlmayr, Christian Holm Hansen, Sophie Madeleine Gubbels, Palle Valentiner-Branth, Peter Bager, Niels Obel, Birgitte Drewes, Camilla Holten Møller, Frederik Trier Møller, Rebecca Legarth and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05774093 (Evaluation of COVID-19 Immune Barrier and Reinfection Risk), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05774093 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of COVID-19 Immune Barrier and Reinfection Risk

TypeobservationalSponsorSun Yat-sen UniversityRan2023 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsCOVID-19 Infection, Immunization, Infection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antigen non-specific CD8bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniela MichlmayrDepartment of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Christian Holm HansenDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Sophie Madeleine GubbelsDivision of Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Palle Valentiner-BranthDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Peter BagerDivision of Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Niels ObelDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Birgitte DrewesDanish Patient Safety Authority, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Camilla Holten MøllerDivision of Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Frederik Trier MøllerDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Rebecca LegarthDivision of Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Kåre MølbakDivision of Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Steen EthelbergDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, 5 Artillerivej, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.
Statens Serum Institut · DKDanish Business Authority · DK

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The level of protection after a SARS-CoV-2 infection against reinfection and COVID-19 disease remains important with much of the world still unvaccinated. Methods: Analysing nationwide, individually referable, Danish register data including RT-PCR-test results, we conducted a cohort study using Cox regression to compare SARS-CoV-2 infection rates before and after a primary infection among still unvaccinated individuals, adjusting for sex, age, comorbidity and residency region. Estimates of protection against infection were calculated as 1 minus the hazard ratio. Estimates of protection against symptomatic infections and infections leading to hospitalisation were also calculated. The prevalence of infections classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic was compared for primary infections and reinfections. The study also assessed protection against each of the main viral variants after a primary infection with an earlier variant by restricting follow-up time to distinct, mutually exclusive periods during which each variant dominated. Findings: Until 1 July 2021 the estimated protection against reinfection was 83.4% (95%CI: 82.2-84.6%); but lower for the 65+ year-olds (72.2%; 95%CI: 53.2-81.0%). Moderately higher estimates were found for protection against symptomatic disease, 88.3% overall (95%CI: 85.9-90.3%). First-time cases who reported no symptoms were more likely to experience a reinfection (odds ratio: 1.48; 95%CI: 1.35-1.62). By autumn 2021, when infections were almost exclusively caused by the Delta variant, the estimated protection following a recent first infection was 91.3% (95%CI: 89.7-92.7%) compared to 71.4% (95%CI: 66.9-75.3%) after a first infection over a year earlier. With Omicron, a first infection with an earlier variant in the past 3-6 months gave an estimated 51.0% (95%CI: 50.1-52.0%) protection, whereas a first infection longer than 12 months earlier provided only 19.0% (95%CI: 17.2-20.5%) protection. Protection by an earlier variant-infection against hospitalisation due to a new infection was estimated at: 86.6% (95%CI: 46.3-96.7%) for Alpha, 97.2% (95%CI: 89.0-99.3%) for Delta, and 69.8% (95%CI: 51.5-81.2%) for the Omicron variant. Interpretation: SARS-CoV-2 infection offered a high level of sustained protection against reinfection, comparable with that offered by vaccines, but decreased with the introduction of new main virus variants; dramatically so when Omicron appeared. Protection was lower among the elderly but appeared more pronounced following symptomatic compared to asymptomatic infections. The level of estimated protection against serious disease was somewhat higher than that against infection and possibly longer lasting. Decreases in protection against reinfection, seemed primarily to be driven by viral evolution. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Cohort studiesCOVID-19EpidemicHerd immunityImmunityReinfectionSARS-CoV-2 variants

Identifiers

PMID35791335
PMCPMC9245510
OpenAlexW4283719322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.