Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35791320›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2022

Safety and immunogenicity of mRNA-LNP COVID-19 vaccine CVnCoV in Latin American adults: A phase 2 randomized study.

Xavier Sáez-Llorens, Claudio Lanata, Elaine Aranguren, Carlos R Celis, Rubelio Cornejo, Rodrigo DeAntonio, Lucie Ecker, Diegi Garrido, Ana I Gil, Marina Gonzales and 13 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Xavier Sáez-LlorensCevaxin, The Panama Clinic, Panama City, Panama.
Claudio LanataInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Peru.
Elaine ArangurenCevaxin, The Panama Clinic, Panama City, Panama.
Carlos R CelisCevaxin, The Panama Clinic, Panama City, Panama.
Rubelio CornejoInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Peru.
Rodrigo DeAntonioCevaxin, The Panama Clinic, Panama City, Panama.
Lucie EckerInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, Lima, Peru.
Diegi GarridoCevaxin, The Panama Clinic, Panama City, Panama.
Ana I GilInstituto de Investigación Nutricional, La Molina, Peru.
Marina GonzalesCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Morgan Hess-HoltzCevaxin, The Panama Clinic, Panama City, Panama.
Geert Leroux-RoelsGhent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Helga JunkerCureVac AG, Frankfurt, Germany.
Sarah-Katharina KaysGhent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Sven D KochCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Sandra LazzaroCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Philipp MannCureVac AG, Frankfurt, Germany.
Gianluca QuintiniCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Barkha SrivastavaCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Dominik VahrenhorstCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Philipp von Eisenhart-RotheCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Olaf-Oliver WolzCureVac AG, Tübingen, Germany.
Lidia OostvogelsCureVac AG, Frankfurt, Germany.
CureVac (Germany) · DEInstituto de Investigación Nutricional · PEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 vaccine candidate CVnCoV comprises sequence-optimized mRNA encoding SARS-CoV-2 S-protein encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles. In this phase 2a study, we assessed reactogenicity and immunogenicity of two or three doses in younger and older adults. Methods: Younger (18-60 years) and older (>60 years) adults were enrolled in two sites in Panama and Peru to receive either 6 or 12 µg doses of CVnCoV or licensed control vaccines 28 days apart; subsets received a 12 µg booster dose on Day 57 or Day 180. Solicited adverse events (AE) were reported for 7 days and unsolicited AEs for 4 weeks after each vaccination, and serious AEs (SAE) throughout the study. Humoral immunogenicity was measured as neutralizing and receptor binding domain (RBD) IgG antibodies and cellular immunogenicity was assessed as CD4+/CD8 + T cell responses. Results: A total of 668 participants were vaccinated (332 aged 18-60 years and 336 aged > 60 years) including 75 who received homologous booster doses. Vaccination was well tolerated with no vaccine-related SAEs. Solicited and unsolicited AEs were mainly mild to moderate and resolved spontaneously. Both age groups demonstrated robust immune responses as neutralizing antibodies or RBD-binding IgG, after two doses, with lower titers in the older age group than the younger adults. Neither group achieved levels observed in human convalescent sera (HCS), but did equal or surpass HCS levels following homologous booster doses. Following CVnCoV vaccination, robust SARS-CoV-2 S-protein-specific CD4 + T-cell responses were observed in both age groups with CD8 + T-cell responses in some individuals, consistent with observations in convalescing COVID-19 patients after natural infection. Conclusions: We confirmed that two 12 µg doses of CVnCoV had an acceptable safety profile, and induced robust immune responses. Marked humoral immune responses to homologous boosters suggest two doses had induced immune memory.

Indexed as

CMI, Cellular mediated immunityCOVID-19CVnCoV, CureVacmRNA-LNP COVID-19 vaccineImmunogenicityLNP, Lipid nanoparticlesmRNA vaccinePhase IISafetySARS-CoV-2SARS-CoV-2, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Identifiers

PMID35791320
PMCPMC9247226
OpenAlexW4283751055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.