Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35791139›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

Evaluation of a revised care plan for babies with retinopathy of prematurity during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in India.

Dinesh Narayan Suhan, Avinash Singh, Utpal Bhusal, Bhavik Panchal, Komal Agarwal, Sameera Nayak, Sameer Nayak, Sushma Jayanna, Taraprasad Das, Subhadra Jalali and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dinesh Narayan SuhanResident, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Avinash SinghOptometrist, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Utpal BhusalAdjunct Optometrist, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Bhavik PanchalFaculty, Vitreoretinal Services, GMR Varalakshmi Campus, Visakhapatnam, India.
Komal AgarwalFaculty, Vitreoretinal Services, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, India.
Sameera NayakFaculty, Vitreoretinal Services, Kode Venkatadri Chowdary Campus, Vijayawada, India.
Sameer NayakProject Co-ordinator, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sushma JayannaFaculty, Vitreoretinal Services, Smt. Kannuri Santhamma Center for Vitreoretinal Diseases, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, India.
Taraprasad DasDirector, Newborn Eye Health Alliance, LV Prasad Eye Network, Bhubaneswar, India.
Subhadra JalaliFellow, Vitreoretinal services, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Vishal Sanjay JadhavFaculty, Vitreoretinal services, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
Tapas Ranjan PadhiFaculty, Vitreoretinal services, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Bhubaneswar, India.
L V Prasad Eye Institute · INDr. Reddy's Laboratories (India) · INNaval Science & Technological Laboratory · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the impact of a revised care plan for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in a tertiary eye care facility in eastern India. Methods: In a retrospective study, we analyzed the medical records of babies managed for ROP during the peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with particular reference to the challenges, and the revised strategies addressing travel restrictions for five months, from April to August 2020. The strategy included selective referral (babies with higher treatment probability), longer follow-up intervals (babies with non-alarming findings), use of locally available workforce, and teleconsultation whenever feasible. Results: In the given period, 222 babies were examined versus 624 in the preceding year (P = 0.001). The average gestational age, birth weight, and postmenstrual age at presentation were 30.4 weeks, 1.31 kg, and 37.7 weeks, respectively. The first examination was on time in 40.1% of babies but was delayed by a median of 23 days in the remaining babies. In the cohort, 56.7% of babies had any ROP, and 27.9% required treatment (versus 8.8% in the previous year; P < 0.001). The intravitreal anti-vascular growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection was more often used than in the previous year (n = 72 vs 36; P < 0.0001). The treatment outcome was comparable before and after the SARS-CoV-2 lockdown period. There was no report of health issues among the care providers attributable to ROP care. Conclusion: The revised strategy resulted in a smaller pool of babies screened but a larger proportion of babies treated for ROP. This strategy could be used more profitably in future ROP care.

Indexed as

COVID-19Retinopathy of PrematurityCommunicable Disease ControlHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematurePandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19lockdownretinopathy of prematuritySARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Identifiers

PMID35791139
PMCPMC9426158
OpenAlexW4284681015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.