Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35791082›Full record

ArticleAPMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica2022

Screening the Tocriscreen™ bioactive compound library in search for inhibitors of Candida biofilm formation.

Hafsa Abduljalil, Ahmed Bakri, Khawlah Albashaireh, Om Alkhir Alshanta, Jason L Brown, Leighann Sherry, Ryan Kean, Christopher Nile, William McLean, Gordon Ramage

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biofilm sensitization to breakJournal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Antifungal therapy ofBiofilm · 2023
    Article
  3. Candida auris, a singular emergent pathogenic yeast: its resistance and new therapeutic alternatives.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hafsa Abduljalil *Glasgow Biofilm Research Network, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Ahmed Bakri *Glasgow Biofilm Research Network, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Khawlah Albashaireh *Glasgow Biofilm Research Network, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Om Alkhir AlshantaGlasgow Biofilm Research Network, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jason L BrownGlasgow Biofilm Research Network, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Leighann SherryGlasgow Biofilm Research Network, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Ryan KeanDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Christopher NileSchool of Dental Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
William McLeanGlasgow Biofilm Research Network, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Gordon RamageGlasgow Biofilm Research Network, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
University of Glasgow · GBGlasgow Caledonian University · GBNewcastle Dental Hospital · GB

Funding

Jordan University of Science and TechnologyMinistry of Health MalaysiaMinistry of Higher Education
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilms formed by Candida species present a significant clinical problem due to the ineffectiveness of many conventional antifungal agents, in particular the azole class. We urgently require new and clinically approved antifungal agents quickly for treatment of critically ill patients. To improve efficiency in antifungal drug development, we utilized a library of 1280 biologically active molecules within the Tocriscreen 2.0 Micro library. Candida auris NCPF 8973 and Candida albicans SC5314 were initially screened for biofilm inhibitory activity using metabolic and biomass quantitative assessment methods, followed up by targeted evaluation of five selected hits. The initial screening (80% metabolic inhibition rate) revealed that there was 90 and 87 hits (approx. 7%) for C. albicans and C. auris, respectively. Additionally, all five compounds selected from the initial hits exhibited a biofilm inhibition effect against several key Candida species tested, including C. glabrata and C. krusei. Toyocamycin displayed the most potent activity at concentrations as low as 0.5 μg/mL, though was limited to inhibition. Darapladib demonstrated an efficacy for biofilm inhibition and treatment at a concentration range from 8 to 32 μg/mL and from 16 to 256 μg/mL, respectively. Combinational testing with conventional antifungals against C. albicans strains demonstrated a range of synergies for planktonic cells, and notably an anti-biofilm synergy for darapladib and caspofungin. Together, these data provide new insights into antifungal management possibilities for Candida biofilms.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaBiofilmsCandida albicansHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsBiofilmCandida albicansCandida aurisdrug repurposing

Identifiers

PMID35791082
PMCPMC9541805
OpenAlexW4283823468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.