Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35791019›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2022

Metabolic modeling of the International Space Station microbiome reveals key microbial interactions.

Rachita K Kumar, Nitin Kumar Singh, Sanjaay Balakrishnan, Ceth W Parker, Karthik Raman, Kasthuri Venkateswaran

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating Metabolic Support in Pairwise Microbial Communities Using MetQuest.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachita K KumarRobert Bosch Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (RBCDSAI), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600 036, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4863-403X
Nitin Kumar SinghNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, M/S 89-2, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA, CA 91109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5344-1190
Sanjaay BalakrishnanCenter for Integrative Biology and Systems mEdicine (IBSE), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600 036, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3393-0557
Ceth W ParkerNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, M/S 89-2, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA, CA 91109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4328-490X
Karthik RamanRobert Bosch Centre for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence (RBCDSAI), Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600 036, India. kraman@iitm.ac.in.ORCID 0000-0002-9311-7093
Kasthuri VenkateswaranNASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, M/S 89-2, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena, CA, CA 91109, USA. kjvenkat@jpl.nasa.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-6742-0873
Indian Institute of Technology Madras · INJet Propulsion Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have provided insights into the persistence and succession of microbes aboard the International Space Station (ISS), notably the dominance of Klebsiella pneumoniae. However, the interactions between the various microbes aboard the ISS and how they shape the microbiome remain to be clearly understood. In this study, we apply a computational approach to predict possible metabolic interactions in the ISS microbiome and shed further light on its organization.

resultsThrough a combination of a systems-based graph-theoretical approach, and a constraint-based community metabolic modeling approach, we demonstrated several key interactions in the ISS microbiome. These complementary approaches provided insights into the metabolic interactions and dependencies present amongst various microbes in a community, highlighting key interactions and keystone species. Our results showed that the presence of K. pneumoniae is beneficial to many other microorganisms it coexists with, notably those from the Pantoea genus. Species belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family were often found to be the most beneficial for the survival of other microorganisms in the ISS microbiome. However, K. pneumoniae was found to exhibit parasitic and amensalistic interactions with Aspergillus and Penicillium species, respectively. To prove this metabolic prediction, K. pneumoniae and Aspergillus fumigatus were co-cultured under normal and simulated microgravity, where K. pneumoniae cells showed parasitic characteristics to the fungus. The electron micrography revealed that the presence of K. pneumoniae compromised the morphology of fungal conidia and degenerated its biofilm-forming structures.

conclusionOur study underscores the importance of K. pneumoniae in the ISS, and its potential positive and negative interactions with other microbes, including potential pathogens. This integrated modeling approach, combined with experiments, demonstrates the potential for understanding the organization of other such microbiomes, unravelling key organisms and their interdependencies. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Microbial InteractionsMicrobiotaBiofilmsCoculture TechniquesEnterobacteriaceaeCommunity modelingMetabolic networksMicrobial communitiesNetwork biologySpace microbiome

Identifiers

PMID35791019
PMCPMC9258157
OpenAlexW4284679262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.