ArticleAIDS research and therapy2022
Immune response and safety to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine: a comparison between people living with HIV and HIV-naive individuals.
Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines among people living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Epidemiology and infection · 2023Pooled it
- Serological response following COVID-19 vaccines in patients living with HIV: a dose-response meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Immunogenicity and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Efficacy, safety, and public attitude toward COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review.Annals of African medicinePooled it
- Comparative immunogenicity and neutralizing antibody responses post heterologous vaccination with CoronaVac (Sinovac) and Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) in HIV-infected patients with varying CD4+ T lymphocyte counts.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- Correction: Immune response and safety to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine: a comparison between people living with HIV and HIV-naive individuals.AIDS research and therapy · 2024Article
- People living with HIV with the Omicron variant infection have milder COVID-19 symptoms: results from a cross-sectional study.AIDS research and therapy · 2024Article
- Hospitalizations for Acute Otitis and Sinusitis in Patients Living with HIV: A Retrospective Analysis of a Tertiary Center in Romania.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Uptake and impact of COVID-19 vaccination among HIV key populations: a cohort study from Tamil Nadu, India.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2023Article
- A Review of Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine Development in China: Focusing on Safety and Efficacy in Special Populations.Vaccines · 2023Review
- Correlation between CD4 T-Cell Counts and Seroconversion among COVID-19 Vaccinated Patients with HIV: A Meta-Analysis.Vaccines · 2023Review
- Humoral immune response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccination at the 3rd month among people living with HIV.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- A tale of two conditions: when people living with HIV meet three doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Recent review of COVID-19 management: diagnosis, treatment and vaccination.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2022Review
- Advances in Research on COVID-19 Vaccination for People Living with HIV.Infectious diseases & immunity · 2022Article
- HIV infection and the implication for COVID-19 vaccination.Public health challenges · 2022Review
- SARS-CoV-2 immunity and vaccine strategies in people with HIV.Oxford open immunology · 2022Review
- Six-month humoral immune response to inactivated COVID-19 vaccine among people living with HIV.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMulti-types COVID-19 vaccines have shown safety and efficacy against COVID-19 in adults. Although current guidelines encourage people living with HIV (PLWH) to take COVID-19 vaccines, whether their immune response to COVID-19 vaccines is distinct from HIV-free individuals is still unclear.
methodsBetween March to June 2021, 48 PLWH and 40 HNC, aged 18 to 59 years, were enrolled in the study in Wuchang district of Wuhan city. All of them received inactivated COVID-19 vaccine (Sinopharm, WIBP-CorV, Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co. Ltd) at day 0 and the second dose at day 28. The primary safety outcome was the combined adverse reactions within 7 days after each injection. The primary immunogenicity outcomes were SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) responses by chemiluminescence and total specific IgM and IgG antibodies responses by ELISA and colloidal gold at baseline (day 0), day 14, day 28, day 42, and day 70.
resultsIn total, the study included 46 PLWH and 38 HNC who finished 70 days' follow-up. The frequency of adverse reactions to the first and second dose was not different between PLWH (30% and 11%) vs. HNC (32% and 24%). NAbs responses among PLWH peaked at day 70, while among HNC peaked at day 42. At day 42, the geometric mean concentration (GMC) and seroconversion rate of nAbs among PLWH were 4.46 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL (95% CI 3.18-5.87) and 26% (95% CI 14-41), which were lower than that among HNC [GMC (18.28 BAU/mL, 95% CI 10.33-32.33), seroconversion rate (63%, 95% CI 44-79)]. IgG responses among both PLWH and HNC peaked at day 70. At day 70, the geometric mean ELISA units (GMEU) and seroconversion rate of IgG among PLWH were 0.193 ELISA units (EU)/mL (95% CI 0.119-0.313) and 51% (95% CI 34-69), which was lower than that among HNC [GMEU (0.379 EU/mL, 95% CI 0.224-0.653), seroconversion rate (86%, 95% CI 64-97)]. There were no serious adverse events.
conclusionsEarly humoral immune response to the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine was weaker and delayed among the PLWH population than that among HNC. This observation remained consistent regardless of a high CD4 count with effective antiretroviral therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.