ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2022
The value of myocardial work in assessment of ventricular function in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of myocardial work indices in evaluating cardiac function damage in active acromegaly patients.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
- Characterisation of interrelations among myocardial work parameters in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: differences between non-obstructive and obstructive disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of global and regional myocardial work by echocardiography in patients with Fabry disease.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Prognostic Relevance of Global Myocardial Work Index in Patients with Moderate Aortic Valve Stenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The Establishment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Diagnosis Model via Artificial Neural Network and Random Decision Forest Method.Mediators of inflammation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate myocardial work using speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
methodsFifty patients with HCM and 50 normal controls were included. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was quantified using the bi-plane Simpson's method. Myocardial work parameters, which included global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global waste work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE), were derived from the 2D strain-pressure loop.
resultsThe patient group was older (49.19 ± 14.69 vs. 37.16 ± 7.49 years old) and had a higher body mass index (24.93 ± 3.67 vs. 23.26 ± 3.32 kg/m
conclusionsAssessing myocardial work adds useful information of LV function in patients with non-obstructive HCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.