Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35790916›Full record

Observational studyBMC cancer2022

Determination of essential biomarkers in lung cancer: a real-world data study in Spain with demographic, clinical, epidemiological and pathological characteristics.

Mariano Provencio, Manuel Cobo, Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu, Virginia Calvo, Enric Carcereny, Alexandra Cantero, Reyes Bernabé, Gretel Benitez, Rafael López Castro, Bartomeu Massutí and 21 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Survival in Patients withCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Observational
  3. Quality of care assessment for non-small cell lung cancer patients: transforming routine care data into a continuous improvement system.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

Mariano ProvencioMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, C/ Manuel de Falla 1, Majadahonda, 28222, Madrid, Spain. mprovenciop@gmail.com.
Manuel CoboHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Delvys Rodriguez-AbreuHospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Virginia CalvoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, C/ Manuel de Falla 1, Majadahonda, 28222, Madrid, Spain.
Enric CarcerenyCatalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, B-ARGO, IGTP, Badalona, Spain.
Alexandra CanteroHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Reyes BernabéHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.
Gretel BenitezHospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Rafael López CastroHospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Bartomeu MassutíHospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Edel Del BarcoHospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Rosario García CampeloComplejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Maria GuiradoHospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain.
Carlos CampsHospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Ana Laura OrtegaHospital Universitario de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Jose Luis González LarribaHospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Alfredo SánchezHospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.
Joaquín CasalComplexo Hospitalario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
M Angeles SalaOSI Bilbao Basurto, Bibao, Spain.
Oscar Juan-VidalHospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Joaquim Bosch-BarreraCatalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
Juana OramasHospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Manuel DómineHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz. IIS-FJD, Madrid, Spain.
Jose Manuel TrigoHospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Remei BlancoConsorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
Julia CalzasHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Fuenlabrada, Spain.
Idoia MorillaComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Navarra, Spain.
Airam PadillaHospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Joao PimentaoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro A SousaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Maria TorrenteMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, C/ Manuel de Falla 1, Majadahonda, 28222, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Horizon 2020 875160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe survival of patients with lung cancer has substantially increased in the last decade by about 15%. This increase is, basically, due to targeted therapies available for advanced stages and the emergence of immunotherapy itself. This work aims to study the situation of biomarker testing in Spain. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe Thoracic Tumours Registry (TTR) is an observational, prospective, registry-based study that included patients diagnosed with lung cancer and other thoracic tumours, from September 2016 to 2020. This TTR study was sponsored by the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (GECP) Foundation, an independent, scientific, multidisciplinary oncology society that coordinates more than 550 experts and 182 hospitals across the Spanish territory.

resultsNine thousand two hundred thirty-nine patients diagnosed with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 2106 and 2020 were analysed. 7,467 (80.8%) were non-squamous and 1,772 (19.2%) were squamous. Tumour marker testing was performed in 85.0% of patients with non-squamous tumours vs 56.3% in those with squamous tumours (p-value < 0.001). The global testing of EGFR, ALK, and ROS1 was 78.9, 64.7, 35.6% respectively, in non-squamous histology. PDL1 was determined globally in the same period (46.9%), although if we focus on the last 3 years it exceeds 85%. There has been a significant increase in the last few years of all determinations and there are even close to 10% of molecular determinations that do not yet have targeted drug approval but will have it in the near future. 4,115 cases had a positive result (44.5%) for either EGFR, ALK, KRAS, BRAF, ROS1, or high PDL1.

conclusionsDespite the lack of a national project and standard protocol in Spain that regulates the determination of biomarkers, the situation is similar to other European countries. Given the growing number of different determinations and their high positivity, national strategies are urgently needed to implement next-generation sequencing (NGS) in an integrated and cost-effective way in lung cancer.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDemographyErbB ReceptorsHumansProspective StudiesProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesSpainBiomarkers, TumorErbB ReceptorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesBiomarkersMetastatic lung cancerTargeted therapiesTesting

Identifiers

PMID35790916
PMCPMC9254518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.