Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35790914›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2022

Quantitative proteomics reveals protein dysregulation during T cell activation in multiple sclerosis patients compared to healthy controls.

Chiara Cappelletti, Anna Eriksson, Ina Skaara Brorson, Ingvild S Leikfoss, Oda Kråbøl, Einar August Høgestøl, Valeria Vitelli, Olav Mjaavatten, Hanne F Harbo, Frode Berven and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Controversy and multiple roles of the solitary nucleus receptor Nur77 in disease and physiology.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Prominent epigenetic and transcriptomic changes in CD4Journal of neuroinflammation · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiara CappellettiDepartment of Mechanical, Electronics and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Art and Design, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Postboks 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway.
Anna ErikssonInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ina Skaara BrorsonInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingvild S LeikfossInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Oda KråbølNeuroscience Research Unit, Department of Research, Innovation and Education, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Einar August HøgestølInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Valeria VitelliOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Olav MjaavattenProteomics Unit at University of Bergen (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Postboks 7804, 5020, Bergen, Norway.
Hanne F HarboInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Frode BervenProteomics Unit at University of Bergen (PROBE), Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Postboks 7804, 5020, Bergen, Norway.
Steffan D BosDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Postboks 4950, 0424 Nydalen, Oslo, Norway.
Tone BergeDepartment of Mechanical, Electronics and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Art and Design, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Postboks 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway. tone.berge@oslomet.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5297-2034
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Bergen · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NO

Funding

Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2017114Helse Sør-Øst RHF 240102Norges Forskningsråd 295910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune, neurodegenerative disorder with a strong genetic component that acts in a complex interaction with environmental factors for disease development. CD4

methodsCD4

resultsUpon T cell activation the abundance of 1801 proteins was changed. Among these proteins, we observed an enrichment of proteins expressed by MS-susceptibility genes. When comparing protein abundances in T cell samples from healthy controls and MS patients, 18 and 33 proteins were differentially expressed in unstimulated and stimulated CD4

conclusionsOur study highlights the importance of CD4

Indexed as

AutoimmunityDisease susceptibility genesMultiple sclerosisProteomicsT cell activation

Identifiers

PMID35790914
PMCPMC9254507
OpenAlexW4283814668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.