Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35790796›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Effect of the combination of biological, chemical control and agronomic technique in integrated management pea root rot and its productivity.

Nargis Nazir, Zaffar Afroz Badri, Nazir Ahmad Bhat, Farooq Ahmad Bhat, Phalisteen Sultan, Tashooq Ahmad Bhat, Mohd Ashraf Rather, Aafreen Sakina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring Endophytic Bacteria fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Antifungal Properties of Bio-AgNPs againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nargis NazirDivision of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST- K, Wadura, Sopore, Jammu and Kashmir, 193201, India.
Zaffar Afroz BadriKrishi Vigyan Kendra Malangpora, Pulwama, Jammu and Kashmir, 192301, India.
Nazir Ahmad BhatMountain Research Centre for Field Crops, Khudwani, Kulgam, Jammu and Kashmir, 192101, India.
Farooq Ahmad BhatDivision of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST- K, Wadura, Sopore, Jammu and Kashmir, 193201, India.
Phalisteen SultanCSIR-IIIM, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, 190005, India.
Tashooq Ahmad BhatDivision of Food Science and Technology, SKUAST-K, Shalimar, 190025, India. tashu1746@gmail.com.
Mohd Ashraf RatherDivision of Fish Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Fisheries, SKUAST-K, Rangil, Ganderbal, 191201, India.
Aafreen SakinaCSIR-IIIM, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, 190005, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root rot of pea caused by Fusarium spp. is one of the important diseases of pea (Pisum sativum L.). The causal fungus of the disease isolated from naturally infected pea plants was identified as Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi (Jones). Evaluation of four bio agents and nine fungicides was done in vitro against Fusarium solani. Trichoderma harzianum was the most effective bio agent in inhibiting the mycelial growth of F. solani by (82.62%). Carbendazim 50 WP was the most effective fungicide in inhibiting the mycelial growth of F. solani by (91.06%). Carbendazim at the rate of 0.1% and T. harzianum at concentration of 10

Indexed as

Fungicides, IndustrialPisum sativumFusariumPlant DiseasesPlant RootsSoil MicrobiologyFungicides, Industrial

Identifiers

PMID35790796
PMCPMC9256638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.