Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35790760›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Gastric hydrodistension CT versus CT without gastric distension in preoperative TN staging of gastric carcinoma: analysis of single-center cancer registry.

Yu-Hsien Lee, Wen-Hui Chan, Ying-Chieh Lai, An-Hsin Chen, Chien-Ming Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Hsien LeeDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Wen-Hui ChanDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ying-Chieh LaiDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
An-Hsin ChenDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chien-Ming ChenDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5 Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan, Taiwan. dr.cmchen@gmail.com.
Chang Gung University · TWLinkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate staging of gastric cancer is essential for the selection and optimization of therapy. Hydrodistension of the stomach is recommended to improve the accuracy of preoperative staging with contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). This study compares the performance of contrast-enhanced gastric water distension versus a nondistension MDCT protocol for T and N staging and serosal invasion in comparison to surgical histopathology. After propensity score matching, 86 patients in each group were included for analysis. The overall accuracy of distension versus nondistension group in T staging was 45% (95% CI 35-56) and 55% (95% CI 44-65), respectively (p = 0.29). There was no difference in the sensitivity and specificity in individual T staging and assessment of serosal invasion (all p > 0.41). Individual stage concordance with pathology was not significantly different (all p > 0.41). The overall accuracy of N staging was the same for distension and nondistension groups (51% [95% CI 40-62]). The majority of N0 staging (78-81%) were correctly staged, whereas N3 staging cases (63-68%) were predominantly understaged. In summary, there was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of individual TN staging and assessment of serosal invasion using MDCT with or without gastric water distension.

Indexed as

CarcinomaStomach NeoplasmsHumansMultidetector Computed TomographyRegistriesWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID35790760
PMCPMC9256680
OpenAlexW4283806695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.