Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35790619›Full record

ReviewCognitive processing2022

Memory rehabilitation: restorative, specific knowledge acquisition, compensatory, and holistic approaches.

Yashoda Gopi, Edward Wilding, Christopher R Madan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cognitive processing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07366346 (Telehealth-Adapted Compensatory Training and Intervention for Cognition for People With Mild Cognitive Impairment), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07366346 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Telehealth-Adapted Compensatory Training and Intervention for Cognition for People With Mild Cognitive Impairment

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of FloridaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsMCI, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)ArmsMotivationally Enhanced Compensatory Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment (ME-CCT-MCI), Brief Motivationally Enhanced Compensatory Cognitive Training for Mild Cognitive Impairment (bME-CCT-MCI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yashoda GopiSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. yashoda.gopi@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0528-1246
Edward WildingSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Christopher R MadanSchool of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory impairment following an acquired brain injury can negatively impact daily living and quality of life-but can be reduced by memory rehabilitation. Here, we review the literature on four approaches for memory rehabilitation and their associated strategies: (1) the restorative approach, aimed at a return to pre-morbid functioning, (2) the knowledge acquisition approach, involving training on specific information relevant to daily life, (3) the compensatory approach, targeted at improving daily functioning, and (4) the holistic approach, in which social, emotional, and behavioral deficits are addressed alongside cognitive consequences of acquired brain injury. Each memory rehabilitation approach includes specific strategies such as drill and practice (restorative), spaced retrieval (knowledge acquisition), memory aids (compensatory), or a combination of psychotherapy and cognitive strategies (holistic). Past research has demonstrated mixed support for the use of restorative strategies to improve memory function, whereas knowledge acquisition strategies show promising results on trained tasks but little generalization to untrained tasks and activities of daily living. Compensatory strategies remain widely used but require intensive training to be effectively employed. Finally, the holistic approach is becoming more widespread due to improvements in psychosocial wellbeing, yet there are considerable resource and cost requirements. Several factors can influence rehabilitation outcomes including metacognition and emotional disturbances. Considerations for future research to improve the applicability of strategies for memory rehabilitation include assessing memory impairment severity, examining memory needs in daily life, and exploring the long-term effects of memory rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesMetacognitionActivities of Daily LivingHumansMemory DisordersQuality of LifeAcquired brain injuryMemory aidsMemory impairmentMemory rehabilitationMemory strategies

Identifiers

PMID35790619
PMCPMC9553770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.