Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35790603›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2022

Increased Risk of Stroke Due to Non-adherence and Non-persistence with Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs): Real-World Analyses Using a Nested Case-Control Study from The Netherlands, Italy and Germany.

Emily Holthuis, Elisabeth Smits, George Spentzouris, Dominik Beier, Dirk Enders, Rosa Gini, Claudia Bartolini, Giampiero Mazzaglia, Fernie Penning-van Beest, Ron Herings

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Emily HolthuisPHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, 3528 AE, Utrecht, The Netherlands. emily.holthuis@pharmo.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2556-4553
Elisabeth SmitsPHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, 3528 AE, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1882-4748
George SpentzourisDaiichi-Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Dominik BeierInGef-Institute for Applied Health Research, Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Dirk EndersInGef-Institute for Applied Health Research, Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Rosa GiniAgenzi Regionali di Sanità della Toscana, Firenze, Italy.
Claudia BartoliniAgenzi Regionali di Sanità della Toscana, Firenze, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8630-4598
Giampiero MazzagliaCenter for Public Health Research (CESP), University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4933-2148
Fernie Penning-van BeestPHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, 3528 AE, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1906-9724
Ron HeringsPHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Van Deventerlaan 30-40, 3528 AE, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2561-8734
Pharmo Institute · NLAgenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana · ITInstitute for Applied Economic Research · DEDaiichi Sankyo (Germany) · DEUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA high degree of adherence to direct oral anticoagulants is essential for reducing the risk of ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, owing to the rapid decline in anticoagulation activity when doses are omitted (i.e. rebound effect).

objectiveWe aimed to assess the relationship between non-adherence and non-persistence with direct oral anticoagulants and the incidence of ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.

methodsA nested case-control study was conducted in the Netherlands, Italy and Germany among patients with atrial fibrillation starting direct oral anticoagulants between the drug approval date and the end of database availability. Patients with an ischaemic stroke during the follow-up were selected as cases and compared with matched controls (matched on age ± 5 years, sex, year of cohort entry date and CHA

resultsIn The Netherlands, Italy and Germany, 105 cases and 395 controls, 1580 cases and 6248 controls, and 900 cases and 3570 controls were included, respectively. Odds ratios (ORs) for stroke among current users who were non-adherent compared to adherent users were 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-1.96) in The Netherlands, 1.11 (95% CI 0.98-1.26) in Italy and 1.21 (95% CI 1.01-1.45) in Germany. The risk of stroke was significantly higher among non-persistent users compared with persistent users in all three databases [OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.00-2.44), OR 1.48 (1.32-1.65) and OR 1.91 (95% CI 1.64-2.22), respectively]. In The Netherlands and Germany, the risk of stroke was higher the longer a patient had stopped using direct oral anticoagulants.

conclusionsBoth non-adherence (in Germany) and non-persistence increased the risk of stroke, either using a once-daily or twice-daily regime.

Identifiers

PMID35790603
PMCPMC9712875
OpenAlexW4284673435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.