Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35790469›Full record

ArticleMolecular informatics2022

Towards an Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA)-based Target Specific Docking Functions for Virtual Screening.

Jacob Spiegel, Hanoch Senderowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacob SpiegelDepartment of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 5290002, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3703-4840
Hanoch SenderowitzDepartment of Chemistry, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, 5290002, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Docking-based virtual screening (VS) is a common starting point in many drug discovery projects. While ligand-based approaches may sometimes provide better results, the advantage of docking lies in its ability to provide reliable ligand binding modes and approximated binding free energies, two factors that are important for hit selection and optimization. Most docking programs were developed to be as general as possible and consequently their performances on specific targets may be sub-optimal. With this in mind, in this work we present a method for the development of target-specific scoring functions using our recently reported Enrichment Optimization Algorithm (EOA). EOA derives QSAR models in the form of multiple linear regression (MLR) equations by optimizing an enrichment-like metric. Since EOA requires target-specific active and inactive (or decoy) compounds, we retrieved such data for six targets from the DUD-E database, and used them to re-derive the weights associated with the components that make up GOLD's ChemPLP scoring function yielding target-specific, modified functions. We then used the original ChemPLP function in small-scale VS experiments on the six targets and subsequently rescored the resulting poses with the modified functions. In addition, we used the modified functions for compounds re-docking. We found that in many although not all cases, either rescoring the original ChemPLP poses or repeating the entire docking process with the modified functions, yielded better results in terms of AUC and EF

Indexed as

AlgorithmsProteinsBinding SitesLigandsProtein BindingLigandsProteinsdockingenrichment optimization algorithmEOAGOLDQSARtarget specific scoring functionsvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID35790469
PMCPMC9786651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.