Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35790403›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

The Spatial Reach of Neuronal Coherence and Spike-Field Coupling across the Human Neocortex.

John C Myers, Elliot H Smith, Marcin Leszczynski, James O'Sullivan, Mark J Yates, Guy McKhann, Nima Mesgarani, Charles Schroeder, Catherine Schevon, Sameer A Sheth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Synchronous Rhythmic Activity in Area V4 Can Impair Shape Detection and Neuronal Reliability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John C MyersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030 john.myers@bcm.edu.
Elliot H SmithDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132.
Marcin LeszczynskiDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.
James O'SullivanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027.
Mark J YatesDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.
Guy McKhannDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.
Nima MesgaraniDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027.
Charles SchroederDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.
Catherine SchevonDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032.
Sameer A ShethDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.
Columbia University · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

COGNITIVE CONTROL MECHANISMS IN HUMAN PREFRONTAL CORTEXR01MH106700 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHETH, SAMEER ANIL · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal coherence is thought to be a fundamental mechanism of communication in the brain, where synchronized field potentials coordinate synaptic and spiking events to support plasticity and learning. Although the spread of field potentials has garnered great interest, little is known about the spatial reach of phase synchronization, or neuronal coherence. Functional connectivity between different brain regions is known to occur across long distances, but the locality of synchronization across the neocortex is understudied. Here we used simultaneous recordings from electrocorticography (ECoG) grids and high-density microelectrode arrays to estimate the spatial reach of neuronal coherence and spike-field coherence (SFC) across frontal, temporal, and occipital cortices during cognitive tasks in humans. We observed the strongest coherence within a 2-3 cm distance from the microelectrode arrays, potentially defining an effective range for local communication. This range was relatively consistent across brain regions, spectral frequencies, and cognitive tasks. The magnitude of coherence showed power law decay with increasing distance from the microelectrode arrays, where the highest coherence occurred between ECoG contacts, followed by coherence between ECoG and deep cortical local field potential (LFP), and then SFC (i.e., ECoG > LFP > SFC). The spectral frequency of coherence also affected its magnitude. Alpha coherence (8-14 Hz) was generally higher than other frequencies for signals nearest the microelectrode arrays, whereas delta coherence (1-3 Hz) was higher for signals that were farther away. Action potentials in all brain regions were most coherent with the phase of alpha oscillations, which suggests that alpha waves could play a larger, more spatially local role in spike timing than other frequencies. These findings provide a deeper understanding of the spatial and spectral dynamics of neuronal synchronization, further advancing knowledge about how activity propagates across the human brain.

Indexed as

NeocortexAction PotentialsElectrocorticographyHumansMicroelectrodesNeuronscoherenceneural oscillationsspatial reachspike-field coherence

Identifiers

PMID35790403
PMCPMC9374135
OpenAlexW4283828361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.