Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35790108›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2022

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of IgD myeloma: experience across UK national trials.

Charles Agbuduwe, Gulnaz Iqbal, David Cairns, Tom Menzies, Janet Dunn, Walter Gregory, Martin Kaiser, Roger Owen, Charlotte Pawlyn, J Anthony Child and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01554852 (Randomised Comparisons, in Myeloma Patients of All Ages, of Thalidomide, Lenalidomide, Carfilzomib and Bortezomib Induction Combinations, and of Lenalidomide and Combination Lenalidomide Vorinostat as Maintenance), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01554852 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Randomised Comparisons, in Myeloma Patients of All Ages, of Thalidomide, Lenalidomide, Carfilzomib and Bortezomib Induction Combinations, and of Lenalidomide and Combination Lenalidomide Vorinostat as Maintenance (Myeloma XI)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LeedsRan2010 to 2022Enrolled4,420ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsInduction (intensive pathway) - cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, & dexamethasone (CRD) regimen, Induction (intensive pathway) - cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, & dexamethasone (CTD) regimen, Induction (intensive pathway) - carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, & dexamethasone (CCRD) regimen, Induction (non-intensive pathway) - cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, & dexamethasone attenuated (CRDa) regimen, Induction (non-intensive pathway) - cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, & dexamethasone attenuated (CTDa) regimen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Plasma cell neoplasms and related entities-evolution in diagnosis and classification.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Charles AgbuduweUCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4783-9853
Gulnaz IqbalWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1391-6021
David CairnsLeeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2338-0179
Tom MenziesLeeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3896-7228
Janet DunnWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Walter GregoryLeeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Martin KaiserThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3677-4804
Roger OwenDepartment of Clinical Haematology, St James's University Hospital, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Charlotte PawlynThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7190-0028
J Anthony ChildLeeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Faith DaviesPerlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Gareth J MorganPerlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Graham H JacksonDepartment of Haematology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Mark T DraysonInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Supratik BasuDepartment of Haematology, New Cross Hospital, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom; and.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 29957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunoglobulin D (IgD) myeloma is a subtype often considered to have adverse features and inferior survival, but there is a paucity of data from large clinical studies. We compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with IgD myeloma from UK phase 3 myeloma trials analyzed in 2 groups: old (1980-2002) and recent (2002-2016) clinical trials, based on the time of adoption of novel myeloma therapies. Patients with IgD myeloma comprised 44 of 2789 (1.6%) and 70 of 5773 (1.2%) of the old and recent trials, respectively. Overall, IgD myeloma was associated with male predominance, low-level paraproteinemia (<10g/L), and λ light chain preference. The frequency of ultra-high-risk cytogenetics was similar in IgD myeloma compared with other subtypes (4.3% vs 5.3%, P > .99). Despite the old trial series being a younger group (median age: 59 vs 63 years, P = .015), there was a higher frequency of bone lesions, advanced stage at diagnosis, worse performance status, and severe renal impairment compared with the recent trials. Furthermore, the early mortality rate was significantly higher for the old trial series (20% vs 4%, P = .01). The overall response rate following induction therapy was significantly higher in the recent trials (89% vs 43%, P < .0001), and this was consistent with improved median overall survival (48 months; 95% confidence interval [CI] 35-67 months vs 22 months; 95% CI, 16-29 months). Survival outcomes for IgD myeloma have significantly improved and are now comparable to other myeloma types because of earlier diagnosis, novel therapies, and improved supportive care. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT01554852.

Indexed as

Age FactorsFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin DImmunoglobulin lambda-ChainsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaParaproteinemiasSex FactorsUnited KingdomImmunoglobulin DImmunoglobulin lambda-Chains

Identifiers

PMID35790108
PMCPMC9631630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.