Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35790053›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Sex differences in predictors and regional patterns of brain age gap estimates.

Nicole Sanford, Ruiyang Ge, Mathilde Antoniades, Amirhossein Modabbernia, Shalaila S Haas, Heather C Whalley, Liisa Galea, Sebastian G Popescu, James H Cole, Sophia Frangou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Metabolic Status Modulates Global and Local Brain Age Estimates in Overweight and Obese Adults.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicole SanfordDepartment of Psychiatry, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4915-2537
Ruiyang GeDepartment of Psychiatry, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mathilde AntoniadesCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Amirhossein ModabberniaDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Shalaila S HaasDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Heather C WhalleyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Liisa GaleaDepartment of Psychology, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sebastian G PopescuBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Imperial College London, London, UK.
James H ColeCentre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1908-5588
Sophia FrangouDepartment of Psychiatry, Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3210-6470

Funding

Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Training the next generation of clinical neuroscientistsT32MH122394 · NIMH · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Rene S. Kahn, ANTONIA S NEW · 2020 to 2026
$2.5M
Medical Research Council MR/R024790/1Medical Research Council MR/R024790/2NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH122394NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The brain-age-gap estimate (brainAGE) quantifies the difference between chronological age and age predicted by applying machine-learning models to neuroimaging data and is considered a biomarker of brain health. Understanding sex differences in brainAGE is a significant step toward precision medicine. Global and local brainAGE (G-brainAGE and L-brainAGE, respectively) were computed by applying machine learning algorithms to brain structural magnetic resonance imaging data from 1113 healthy young adults (54.45% females; age range: 22-37 years) participating in the Human Connectome Project. Sex differences were determined in G-brainAGE and L-brainAGE. Random forest regression was used to determine sex-specific associations between G-brainAGE and non-imaging measures pertaining to sociodemographic characteristics and mental, physical, and cognitive functions. L-brainAGE showed sex-specific differences; in females, compared to males, L-brainAGE was higher in the cerebellum and brainstem and lower in the prefrontal cortex and insula. Although sex differences in G-brainAGE were minimal, associations between G-brainAGE and non-imaging measures differed between sexes with the exception of poor sleep quality, which was common to both. While univariate relationships were small, the most important predictor of higher G-brainAGE was self-identification as non-white in males and systolic blood pressure in females. The results demonstrate the value of applying sex-specific analyses and machine learning methods to advance our understanding of sex-related differences in factors that influence the rate of brain aging and provide a foundation for targeted interventions.

Indexed as

BrainSex CharacteristicsAdultAgingBiomarkersFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultBiomarkersagingbrainAGEhuman connectome projectmachine learningsex differencesstructural MRIyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID35790053
PMCPMC9491279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.