Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35789951›Full record

ReviewNature reviews psychology2022

Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility.

Tenelle Porter, Abdo Elnakouri, Ethan A Meyers, Takuya Shibayama, Eranda Jayawickreme, Igor Grossmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The importance of scientists' intellectual humility for communicating effectively across ideological and identity-based divides.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Wise Mind Balances the Abstract and the Concrete.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tenelle PorterDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4037-0412
Abdo ElnakouriDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Canada.
Ethan A MeyersDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6171-6780
Takuya ShibayamaDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Canada.
Eranda JayawickremeDepartment of Psychology and Program for Leadership and Character, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC USA.
Igor GrossmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2681-3600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a time of societal acrimony, psychological scientists have turned to a possible antidote - intellectual humility. Interest in intellectual humility comes from diverse research areas, including researchers studying leadership and organizational behaviour, personality science, positive psychology, judgement and decision-making, education, culture, and intergroup and interpersonal relationships. In this Review, we synthesize empirical approaches to the study of intellectual humility. We critically examine diverse approaches to defining and measuring intellectual humility and identify the common element: a meta-cognitive ability to recognize the limitations of one's beliefs and knowledge. After reviewing the validity of different measurement approaches, we highlight factors that influence intellectual humility, from relationship security to social coordination. Furthermore, we review empirical evidence concerning the benefits and drawbacks of intellectual humility for personal decision-making, interpersonal relationships, scientific enterprise and society writ large. We conclude by outlining initial attempts to boost intellectual humility, foreshadowing possible scalable interventions that can turn intellectual humility into a core interpersonal, institutional and cultural value.

Indexed as

Human behaviourPsychologySocial behaviour

Identifiers

PMID35789951
PMCPMC9244574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.