Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35789887›Full record

ArticleSocial network analysis and mining2022

A hybrid approach for the detection and monitoring of people having personality disorders on social networks.

Mourad Ellouze, Lamia Hadrich Belguith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social network analysis and mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mourad EllouzeANLP Research Group, MIRACL Laboratory, FSEGS, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Lamia Hadrich BelguithANLP Research Group, MIRACL Laboratory, FSEGS, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in the medical field does not stop evolving. This evolution obliges doctors to be up-to-date in order to well manage every situation that may occur with their patients. However, the medical field is very sensitive and requires a great deal of precision, all of that poses a major problem. Consequently, there is a recourse to computer science, to resolve all of these issues. In this context, we propose in this paper an architecture, taking advantage of artificial intelligence (AI) and text mining techniques to: (i) identify individuals with personality disorder from their textual production on social networks by classifying their set of tweets into distinct classes representing respectively the presence, the category and the type of the disease and (ii) guarantee personalized monitoring by filtering inappropriate tweets according to patient's circumstance. The first phase was achieved by taking advantage of a deep neuronal approach that benefits of: (i) CNN layers for features extraction from the textual part, (ii) two LSTM layers to preserve long-term dependencies between different lexical units, (iii) SVM classifier to detect the sick person using the dependency links found from the previous layer. The second phase was accomplished by applying a hybrid approach that combined linguistic and statistical techniques in order to filter inappropriate tweets according to the state of each patient. Following the evaluation of our approach, we acquire an F-measure rate equivalent to 84% for the detection of personality disorder, 64% for the detection of the type of disease and 70% for the task of filtering inappropriate content. The obtained results are motivating and may encourage researchers to improve them in view of the interest and the importance of this research axis.

Indexed as

Deep learningNatural language processingPersonality disorderSemantic analysisSocial mediaText mining

Identifiers

PMID35789887
PMCPMC9244050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.