ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022
Tumor DNA Methylation Profiles Enable Diagnosis, Prognosis Prediction, and Screening for Cervical Cancer.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of a novel hypermethylation marker, ZSCAN18, and construction of a diagnostic model in cervical cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Article
- Recent advances in applications of machine learning in cervical cancer research: a focus on prediction models.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Article
- Detecting plasma SHOX2, HOXA9, SEPTIN9, and RASSF1A methylation and circulating cancer cells for cholangiocarcinoma clinical diagnosis and monitoring.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Analysis of the triage value of multigene methylation testing for CIN2 + in hrHPV-positive patients.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
- Deciphering the Expression, Functional Role, and Prognostic Significance ofJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2025Article
- Matrix Stiffness-Mediated DNA Methylation in Endothelial Cells.Cellular and molecular bioengineering · 2025Article
- Performance of HPV genotyping andFrontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Methods in DNA methylation array dataset analysis: A review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- Assessing the capacity of methylated DNA markers of cervical squamous cell carcinoma to discriminate oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma in human papillomavirus mediated disease.Oral oncology · 2023Article
- Use of Virus Genotypes in Machine Learning Diagnostic Prediction Models for Cervical Cancer in Women With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Deep Learning-Based Recognition of Cervical Squamous Interepithelial Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: DNA-methylation-based machine learning algorithms have demonstrated powerful diagnostic capabilities, and these tools are currently emerging in many fields of tumor diagnosis and patient prognosis prediction. This work aimed to identify novel DNA methylation diagnostic biomarkers for differentiating cervical cancer (CC) from normal tissues, as well as a prognostic prediction model to predict survival of CC patients. Methods: The methylation profiles with the available clinical characteristics were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) program. We first screened out the differential methylation sites in CC and normal tissues and performed multiple statistical analyses to discover DNA methylation diagnostic markers that are used to distinguish CC and normal control. Then, we developed a methylation-based survival model to improve risk stratification. Results: A diagnostic prediction panel consists of five CpG markers that could predict cervical cancer versus normal tissue with highly correct rate of 100%, and cg16428251, cg22341310, and cg23316360 which in diagnostic prediction panel all could yield high sensitivity and specificity for detection of CC and normal in six cohorts (area under curve [AUC] > 0.8), in addition to excellent performance in discriminating between CC and normal sample. The diagnostic marker panel also effectively predicted the CIN3 versus normal tissue with high accuracy in two datasets (AUC = 0.80, 0.789, respectively). Furthermore, a prognostic prediction model aggregated two CpG markers that effectively stratified the prognosis of high-risk and low-risk groups (training cohort: hazard ratio [HR] 4, 95% CI: 1.7-9.6, Conclusion: The findings of our study showed that DNA methylation markers are of great value in the diagnosis and prognosis of CC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.