Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35789478›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2023

Efficient and robust methods for causally interpretable meta-analysis: Transporting inferences from multiple randomized trials to a target population.

Issa J Dahabreh, Sarah E Robertson, Lucia C Petito, Miguel A Hernán, Jon A Steingrimsson

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Causally Interpretable Meta-analysis: Application in Adolescent HIV Prevention.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Review of Methods for Research Synthesis.Statistics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Data fusion using weakly aligned sources.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Issa J DahabrehCAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2215-9931
Sarah E RobertsonCAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8973-8655
Lucia C PetitoDepartment of Preventative Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0156-1219
Miguel A HernánCAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1619-8456
Jon A SteingrimssonDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2116-9377

Funding

Dynamic Strategies for the clinical management of HIV diseaseR37AI102634 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI MIGUEL HERNAN · 2018 to 2026
$5.3M
Methods for generalizing inferences from cluster randomized controlled trials to target populationsR01LM013616 · NLM · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI DAHABREH, ISSA J. · 2022 to 2025
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI102634NIH HHS R37 AI102634NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present methods for causally interpretable meta-analyses that combine information from multiple randomized trials to draw causal inferences for a target population of substantive interest. We consider identifiability conditions, derive implications of the conditions for the law of the observed data, and obtain identification results for transporting causal inferences from a collection of independent randomized trials to a new target population in which experimental data may not be available. We propose an estimator for the potential outcome mean in the target population under each treatment studied in the trials. The estimator uses covariate, treatment, and outcome data from the collection of trials, but only covariate data from the target population sample. We show that it is doubly robust in the sense that it is consistent and asymptotically normal when at least one of the models it relies on is correctly specified. We study the finite sample properties of the estimator in simulation studies and demonstrate its implementation using data from a multicenter randomized trial.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalCausalityComputer SimulationRandomized Controlled Trials as Topiccausal inferencecombining informationevidence synthesisgeneralizabilitymeta-analysisresearch synthesistransportability

Identifiers

PMID35789478
PMCPMC10948002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.