ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022
Automated Cervical Spinal Cord Segmentation in Real-World MRI of Multiple Sclerosis Patients by Optimized Hybrid Residual Attention-Aware Convolutional Neural Networks.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hippocampal Radiomic Signatures in Multiple Sclerosis Subtypes: A Machine Learning-Based MRI Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Segmentation in Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Review of Research Trends.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
- Fractal-Based Architectures with Skip Connections and Attention Mechanism for Improved Segmentation of MS Lesions in Cervical Spinal Cord.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical Significance of Action Research-Based Seamless Care to Improve Imaging Efficiency and Patients' Cognition, and Alleviate Patient Anxiety.International journal of general medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is the most sensitive clinical tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis (MS) alterations. Spinal cord evaluation has gained interest in this clinical scenario in recent years, but, unlike the brain, there is a more limited choice of algorithms to assist spinal cord segmentation. Our goal was to investigate and develop an automatic MR cervical cord segmentation method, enabling automated and seamless spinal cord atrophy assessment and setting the stage for the development of an aggregated algorithm for the extraction of lesion-related imaging biomarkers. The algorithm was developed using a real-world MR imaging dataset of 121 MS patients (96 cases used as a training dataset and 25 cases as a validation dataset). Transversal, 3D T1-weighted gradient echo MR images (TE/TR/FA = 1.7-2.7 ms/5.6-8.2 ms/12°) were acquired in a 3 T system (Signa HD, GEHC) as standard of care in our clinical practice. Experienced radiologists supervised the manual labelling, which was considered the ground-truth. The 2D convolutional neural network consisted of a hybrid residual attention-aware segmentation method trained to delineate the cervical spinal cord. The training was conducted using a focal loss function, based on the Tversky index to address label imbalance, and an automatic optimal learning rate finder. Our automated model provided an accurate segmentation, achieving a validation DICE coefficient of 0.904 ± 0.101 compared with the manual delineation. An automatic method for cervical spinal cord segmentation on T1-weighted MR images was successfully implemented. It will have direct implications serving as the first step for accelerating the process for MS staging and follow-up through imaging biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.