Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35789314›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2022

Raised Serum Markers of T Cell Activation and Exhaustion in Granulomatous-Lymphocytic Interstitial Lung Disease in Common Variable Immunodeficiency.

Mai Sasaki Aanensen Fraz, Annika Elisabet Michelsen, Natasha Moe, Trond Mogens Aaløkken, Magnhild Eide Macpherson, Ingvild Nordøy, Pål Aukrust, Eli Taraldsrud, Are Martin Holm, Thor Ueland and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Interstitial Lung Disease in Immunocompromised Children.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mai Sasaki Aanensen FrazSection of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway. mai.sasaki.aanensen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2883-6240
Annika Elisabet MichelsenResearch Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7207-2407
Natasha MoeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Trond Mogens AaløkkenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5562-1152
Magnhild Eide MacphersonResearch Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1436-1937
Ingvild NordøySection of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4575-7528
Pål AukrustSection of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6509-6221
Eli TaraldsrudDepartment of Immunology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5239-1854
Are Martin HolmInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2884-9634
Thor UelandResearch Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5005-0784
Silje Fjellgård JørgensenSection of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0968-7051
Børre FevangSection of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6828-0609
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAbout 20-30% of patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) develop granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD) as one of several non-infectious complications to their immunodeficiency. The purpose of this study was to identify biomarkers that could distinguish GLILD from other non-infectious complications in CVID.

methodsWe analyzed serum biomarkers related to inflammation, pulmonary epithelium injury, fibrogenesis, and extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, and compared three subgroups of CVID: GLILD patients (n = 16), patients with other non-infectious complications (n = 37), and patients with infections only (n = 20).

resultsWe found that GLILD patients had higher levels of sCD25, sTIM-3, IFN-γ, and TNF, reflecting T cell activation and exhaustion, compared to both CVID patients with other inflammatory complications and CVID with infections only. GLILD patients also had higher levels of SP-D and CC16, proteins related to pulmonary epithelium injury, as well as the ECM remodeling marker MMP-7, than patients with other non-infectious complications.

conclusionGLILD patients have elevated serum markers of T cell activation and exhaustion, pulmonary epithelium injury, and ECM remodeling, pointing to potentially important pathways in GLILD pathogenesis, novel targets for therapy, and promising biomarkers for clinical evaluation of these patients.

Indexed as

Common Variable ImmunodeficiencyLung Diseases, InterstitialBiomarkersHumansT-LymphocytesBiomarkersCommon variable immunodeficiencyCVIDGLILDgranulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung diseaseILDinterstitial lung disease

Identifiers

PMID35789314
PMCPMC9255534
OpenAlexW4283808971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.