Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35789311›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022

Primary Breast Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Enrique O Martinez, Julie M Jorns, Amanda L Kong, Julie Kijak, Wen-Yao Lee, Chiang-Ching Huang, Chandler S Cortina

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Enrique O MartinezDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Julie M JornsDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Amanda L KongDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Julie KijakDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Wen-Yao LeeChang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Chiang-Ching HuangZilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Chandler S CortinaDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. ccortina@mcw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4750-5028
Medical College of Wisconsin · USChang Gung University · TWUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001436 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI FREED, JULIE K · 2015 to 2025
$47.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001436NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary breast neuroendocrine tumors (BNETs) represent < 1% of breast cancers. Diagnosing BNETs can be challenging, and a limited amount of cohort data currently exists in literature. We aimed to describe primary BNET characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes through the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

methodsA retrospective cohort analysis was performed using the NCDB from 2004 to 2017. BNET cases were compared with patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). A matched IDC cohort was created by matching patient age, race, and disease stage. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed, and hazard ratios (HR) were calculated through the bootstrap sampling method.

resultsA total of 1389 BNET and 1,967,401 IDC cases were identified. When compared with IDC patients, BNET patients were older, had more comorbidities, and were more often male (p < 0.01). BNETs were larger, higher grade, and more frequently hormone receptor negative (p < 0.01). While BNET patients were treated with surgery and radiotherapy (p < 0.01) less often compared with IDC patients, they presented at later disease stage (p < 0.001) and received systemic treatment more frequently (53.5% vs. 40%, p < 0.01). Patients with BNET had increased mortality compared with the matched IDC cohort: stage 1 HR 1.8, stage 2 HR 2.0, stage 3 HR 1.8, and stage 4 HR 1.5 (p < 0.001 for all).

conclusionPatients with BNET tend to present at higher clinical stages, are more frequently hormone receptor negative, and have inferior overall survival compared with patients with IDC. Further treatment strategies and studies are needed to elucidate optimal therapies to maximize patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastNeuroendocrine TumorsHormonesHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesHormones

Identifiers

PMID35789311
PMCPMC9464685
OpenAlexW4283820726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.