Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35789220›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Resuscitation simulation among people who are likely to witness opioid overdose: Experiences from the SOONER Trial.

Jonathan P Whittall, Aaron M Orkin, Curtis Handford, Michelle Klaiman, Pamela Leece, Mercy Charles, Amy Wright, Suzanne Turner, Laurie J Morrison, Carol Strike and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan P WhittallDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0787-5021
Aaron M OrkinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1111-8720
Curtis HandfordDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle KlaimanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pamela LeecePublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mercy CharlesApplied Health Research Centre (AHRC), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amy WrightPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Suzanne TurnerDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Laurie J MorrisonRescu, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8369-9774
Carol StrikeDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Douglas M CampbellApplied Health Research Centre (AHRC), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAMcMaster University · CAPublic Health Ontario · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The opioid crisis is a growing public health emergency and increasing resources are being directed towards overdose education. Simulation has emerged as a novel strategy for training overdose response, yet little is known about training non-clinicians in bystander resuscitation. Understanding the perspectives of individuals who are likely to experience or witness opioid overdose is critical to ensure that emergency response is effective. The Surviving Opioid Overdose with Naloxone Education and Resuscitation (SOONER) study evaluates the effectiveness of a novel naloxone education and distribution tool among people who are non-clinicians and likely to witness opioid overdose. Participants' resuscitation skills are evaluated using a realistic overdose simulation as the primary outcome of the trial. The purpose of our study is to describe the experience of participants with the simulation process in the SOONER study. We employed a semi-structured debriefing interview and a follow up qualitative interview to understand the experience of participants with simulation. A qualitative content analysis was performed using data from 21 participants who participated in the SOONER study. Our qualitative analysis identified 5 themes and 17 subthemes which described the experience of participants within the simulation process. These themes included realism, valuing practical experience, improving self-efficacy, gaining new perspective and bidirectional learning. Our analysis found that simulation was a positive and empowering experience for participants in the SOONER trial, most of whom are marginalized in society. Our study supports the notion that expanding simulation-based education to non-clinicians may offer an acceptable and effective way of supplementing current opioid overdose education strategies. Increasing the accessibility of simulation-based education may represent a paradigm shift whereby simulation is transformed from a primarily academic practice into a patient-based community resource.

Indexed as

Opiate OverdoseResuscitationSimulation TrainingDrug OverdoseHumansNaloxoneSelf EfficacyNaloxone

Identifiers

PMID35789220
PMCPMC9255733
OpenAlexW4284682457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.