Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35789124›Full record

Trial reportUnited European gastroenterology journal2022

LIAISON

Gionata Fiorino, Silvio Danese, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Miquel Sans, Fabrizio Bonelli, Mariella Calleri, Claudia Zierold, Roberta Pollastro, Fabio Moretti, Alberto Malesci

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in United European gastroenterology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05168917 (EURECA), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05168917 nacompletednot on this map

EURECA (EUropeanRElapseCAlprotectin) Study - Calprotectin as Prediction Marker of Relapse in Patients With Quiescent Ulcerative Colitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorDiaSorin Inc.Ran2017 to 2020Enrolled225ConditionsInflammatory Bowel DiseasesArmsLIAISON Calprotectin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. LIAISONUnited European gastroenterology journal · 2022
    Trial
  3. Calprest ELISA vs. LiaisonBiomedicines · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Gionata FiorinoGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5623-2968
Silvio DaneseGastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Laurent Peyrin-BirouletDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France.
Miquel SansService of Digestive Diseases/ISADMU, Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain.
Fabrizio BonelliDiaSorin SpA, Saluggia, Italy.
Mariella CalleriDiaSorin SpA, Saluggia, Italy.
Claudia ZieroldIndependent Consultant to DiaSorin, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7898-0470
Roberta PollastroQuantyca, Monza, Italy.
Fabio MorettiQuantyca, Monza, Italy.
Alberto MalesciUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITQuanta System (Italy) · ITSprint (United States) · USHospital Quirón Teknon · ESInserm · FRVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFecal calprotectin (FC) is established as a diagnostic marker to differentiate between inflammatory bowel diseases and non-inflammatory conditions. Furthermore, it may be effective in monitoring response to treatment, and to predict relapse during maintenance therapy.

designThis was a prospective longitudinal study carried out in Italy, France and Spain. The primary objective was to correlate the LIAISON

resultsThe last FC measured prior to relapse was the variable that predicted relapse in a statistically significant manner. With a 62.3 μg/g cut-off the area under the curve was 0.619, and the sensitivity was 62.9% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 44.9%-78.5%) and specificity 63.0% (95% CI 53.1%-72.1%). Using machine learning methods, the last FC measurement was shown to have the largest impact in predicting relapse. An algorithm was developed that included other variables available following a clinician's visit, which resulted in an area under the curve of 0.754 for predicting relapse.

conclusionIn the present study FC measured by the LIAISON

trial registrationThe trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov with reference number NCT05168917.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexBiomarkersFecesHumansLongitudinal StudiesProspective StudiesRecurrenceBiomarkersLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complexalgorithmcalprotectinflareinflammatory bowel diseasemachine learningrelapseulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID35789124
PMCPMC9557957
OpenAlexW4283805183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.