Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35789123›Full record

ArticleDrug testing and analysis2022

Detection of erythropoiesis stimulating agent Luspatercept after administration to healthy volunteers for antidoping purposes.

Alexandre Marchand, Geoff Miller, Laurent Martin, Coralie Gobbo, Andre K Crouch, Daniel Eichner, Magnus Ericsson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandre MarchandLaboratoire Antidopage Français (LADF), Université Paris-Saclay, Châtenay-Malabry, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2670-6939
Geoff MillerSports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory (SMRTL), South Jordan, Utah, USA.
Laurent MartinLaboratoire Antidopage Français (LADF), Université Paris-Saclay, Châtenay-Malabry, France.
Coralie GobboLaboratoire Antidopage Français (LADF), Université Paris-Saclay, Châtenay-Malabry, France.
Andre K CrouchSports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory (SMRTL), South Jordan, Utah, USA.
Daniel EichnerSports Medicine Research and Testing Laboratory (SMRTL), South Jordan, Utah, USA.
Magnus EricssonLaboratoire Antidopage Français (LADF), Université Paris-Saclay, Châtenay-Malabry, France.
Université Paris-Saclay · FRSurgical Materials Testing Laboratory · GB

Funding

World Anti-Doping Agency 2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Luspatercept (Reblozyl®) is a newly approved anti-anemic drug prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency. It promotes erythropoiesis by limiting apoptosis of immature erythroblasts and the risk of misuse by athletes for doping is high. Proposed detection methods have been published recently but only evaluated in vitro. The objective of this study was to perform the first administration of luspatercept in healthy volunteers for antidoping purpose and to evaluate the detectability in serum, dried capillary blood spots (DBS, collected using TASSO M20 device), and urine. Indirect detection was also evaluated by analyzing hematological parameters for the Athlete Biological Passport. Four volunteers (two males, two females) received one subtherapeutic dose of luspatercept (0.25 mg/kg) followed 3 weeks after by a second dose. Samples were collected from before administration until 7 weeks after the second dose. After immunopurification, electrophoretic separation SDS-/SAR-/IEF- polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and immunodetection, luspatercept was detected at high levels in serum until the end of the collection, sign of a very slow elimination and similarly detected unchanged at lower levels in urine from 2 days after the first administration until 7 weeks postadministration. DBS showed also the same long window of detection. Luspatercept effects were however of limited amplitude on hematological markers, and only two subjects presented atypical points outside the physiological limits during the study. The direct detection method was very efficient, and change of electrophoretic method and detection antibody can be used for confirmation of suspicious samples.

Indexed as

Doping in SportsHematinicsActivin Receptors, Type IIFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsMaleRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSubstance Abuse DetectionActivin Receptors, Type IIHematinicsImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsluspaterceptRecombinant Fusion ProteinsDBSdetection windowimmunodetectionin vivo administrationLuspatercept

Identifiers

PMID35789123
PMCPMC10084338
OpenAlexW4283831205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.