ArticleGenetic epidemiology2022
Deconvolution analysis of cell-type expression from bulk tissues by integrating with single-cell expression reference.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating reference-mixture matching in cell-type deconvolution with single-cell RNA-seq references.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Calcium-related genes predict prognosis, immune characteristics, and response to immunotherapy in LUAD patients.Clinical proteomics · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Underlying Mechanisms of Sanleng-Ezhu for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Based on Network Pharmacology and Single-cell RNA Sequencing Data.Current computer-aided drug design · 2024Article
- Reply to M. Younes.JCO precision oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To understand phenotypic variations and key factors which affect disease susceptibility of complex traits, it is important to decipher cell-type tissue compositions. To study cellular compositions of bulk tissue samples, one can evaluate cellular abundances and cell-type-specific gene expression patterns from the tissue transcriptome profiles. We develop both fixed and mixed models to reconstruct cellular expression fractions for bulk-profiled samples by using reference single-cell (sc) RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) reference data. In benchmark evaluations of estimating cellular expression fractions, the mixed-effect models provide similar results as an elegant machine learning algorithm named cell-type identification by estimating relative subsets of RNA transcripts (CIBERSORTx), which is a well-known and reliable procedure to reconstruct cell-type abundances and cell-type-specific gene expression profiles. In real data analysis, the mixed-effect models outperform or perform similarly as CIBERSORTx. The mixed models perform better than the fixed models in both benchmark evaluations and data analysis. In simulation studies, we show that if the heterogeneity exists in scRNA-seq data, it is better to use mixed models with heterogeneous mean and variance-covariance. As a byproduct, the mixed models provide fractions of covariance between subject-specific gene expression and cell types to measure their correlations. The proposed mixed models provide a complementary tool to dissect bulk tissues using scRNA-seq data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.