Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35788757›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Deep Learning-driven classification of external DICOM studies for PACS archiving.

Frederic Jonske, Maximilian Dederichs, Moon-Sung Kim, Julius Keyl, Jan Egger, Lale Umutlu, Michael Forsting, Felix Nensa, Jens Kleesiek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Frederic JonskeInstitute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany. Frederic.Jonske@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8622-6673
Maximilian DederichsInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Moon-Sung KimInstitute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Julius KeylInstitute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Jan EggerInstitute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Lale UmutluInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Michael ForstingInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Felix NensaInstitute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Jens KleesiekInstitute of AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Girardetstraße 2, 45131, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOver the course of their treatment, patients often switch hospitals, requiring staff at the new hospital to import external imaging studies to their local database. In this study, the authors present MOdality Mapping and Orchestration (MOMO), a Deep Learning-based approach to automate this mapping process by combining metadata analysis and a neural network ensemble.

methodsA set of 11,934 imaging series with existing anatomical labels was retrieved from the PACS database of the local hospital to train an ensemble of neural networks (DenseNet-161 and ResNet-152), which process radiological images and predict the type of study they belong to. We developed an algorithm that automatically extracts relevant metadata from imaging studies, regardless of their structure, and combines it with the neural network ensemble, forming a powerful classifier. A set of 843 anonymized external studies from 321 hospitals was hand-labeled to assess performance. We tested several variations of this algorithm.

resultsMOMO achieves 92.71% accuracy and 2.63% minor errors (at 99.29% predictive power) on the external study classification task, outperforming both a commercial product (82.86% accuracy, 1.36% minor errors, 96.20% predictive power) and a pure neural network ensemble (72.69% accuracy, 10.3% minor errors, 99.05% predictive power) performing the same task. We find that the highest performance is achieved by an algorithm that combines all information into one vote-based classifier.

conclusionDeep Learning combined with metadata matching is a promising and flexible approach for the automated classification of external DICOM studies for PACS archiving. KEY POINTS: • The algorithm can successfully identify 76 medical study types across seven modalities (CT, X-ray angiography, radiographs, MRI, PET (+CT/MRI), ultrasound, and mammograms). • The algorithm outperforms a commercial product performing the same task by a significant margin (> 9% accuracy gain). • The performance of the algorithm increases through the application of Deep Learning techniques.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligenceMachine learningRadiology information systems

Identifiers

PMID35788757
PMCPMC9705446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.