Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35788697›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2022

Gantry-needle-target alignment technique for CT-guided needle approaches to the skull base and cranio-cervical junction.

Marco Pileggi, Elisa Ventura, Alberto Di Napoli, Renato Piantanida, Mario Muto, Andrea Cardia, Alessandro Cianfoni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Complex posterolateral approach for C2 cementoplasty: A case report and review of the literature.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco PileggiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland. marco.pileggi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7691-8999
Elisa VenturaDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
Alberto Di NapoliNESMOS (Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs) Department, School of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy.
Renato PiantanidaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ospedale Regionale Di Lugano, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland.
Mario MutoDepartment of High Technology, Service and Diagnostic Imaging, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Andrea CardiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland.
Alessandro CianfoniDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Via Tesserete 46, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
Laboratory for Biomedical Neurosciences · CHFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITOspedale regionale di Lugano · CHSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCT-guided percutaneous procedures involving the skull base and atlanto-axial cervical spine pose particular challenges due to high density of vital vascular and nervous structures and because the ideal needle trajectory often has a cranio-caudal obliquity different from the axial scan plane. We describe how the variable CT gantry tilt, combined with gantry-needle-target alignment technique, is used to obtain precise and safe needle placement in conventional and non-conventional approaches to the skull base and the atlanto-axial spine.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed consecutive CT-guided needle accesses to the skull base and atlanto-axial spine performed for tissue sampling through fine-needle aspirates and core biopsies, cementoplasty of neoplastic lytic lesions of atlanto-axial spine, pain management injections, and dural puncture for cerebro-spinal fluid sampling. All the accesses were performed with the gantry-needle-target alignment technique. Procedural complications were recorded.

resultsThirty-nine CT-guided procedures were analyzed. Paramaxillary approach was used in 15 cases, postero-lateral in 11, subzygomatic in 3. Nine non-conventional approach were performed: submastoid in 3 cases, suprazygomatic in 2, trans-nasal in 2, trans-mastoid in 1, and trans-auricular in 1. Two peri-procedural complications occurred: one asymptomatic and one resolved within 24 h. All the procedures were successfully completed with successful needle access to the target.

conclusionThe gantry tilt and gantry-needle-target alignment technique allows to obtain double-oblique needle accesses for CT-guided procedures involving the skull base and atlanto-axial cervical spine, minimizing uncertainty of needle trajectory and obtaining safe needle placement in conventional and non-conventional approaches.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeTomography, X-Ray ComputedHeadHumansRetrospective StudiesSkull BaseCT-guided interventionsSkull base

Identifiers

PMID35788697
OpenAlexW4283816422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.