ArticleJAMA network open2022
Association of Remote Technology Use and Other Decentralization Tools With Patient Likelihood to Enroll in Cancer Clinical Trials.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phase 2a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of londamocitinib (AZD4604) two times per day for 12 weeks in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma uncontrolled on medium-high-dose ICS-LABA.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Trial
- Trial
- A Multiregional Decentralized Clinical Trial Program to Improve Access.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in clinical trial participant recruitment and retention: A scoping review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Assessing reporting completeness and characteristics in decentralized randomized controlled trials: a scoping review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Article
- Selecting and Preparing Clinical Sites for the Successful Conduct of Decentralized Clinical Trial Activities-Findings From the Trials@Home RADIAL Proof-of-Concept Trial.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Enrollment and Retention Outcomes from the Veterans Health Administration for a Remote Digital Health Study: Multisite Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Observational
- Adaptation of Clinical Research Staff to Decentralized Clinical Trials and Impacts on the Patient-Centered Experience: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Determinants of first-line clinical trial enrollment among Black and White gynecologic cancer patients.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Observational
- Disparities in the availability of and access to neuro-oncology trial-supporting infrastructure in the United States.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
- Decentralized Clinical Trials in the Era of Real-World Evidence: A Statistical Perspective.Clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Transgender Individuals' Perspectives on Teledermatology-Based Acne Research.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators to recruitment of rural patients to cancer clinical trials.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025Review
- Assessing populations with access to National Cancer Institute-funded sites using local distance-based service areas.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Telehealth in Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trials: Qualitative Study of Patient, Researcher, and Clinician Perspectives.O&G open · 2024Article
- What motivates people with type 2 diabetes mellitus to participate in clinical trials from home?Clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- A digital, decentralized trial of exercise therapy in patients with cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Patient and Public Perceptions in Canada About Decentralized and Hybrid Clinical Trials: "It's About Time we Bring Trials to People".Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Logistical challenges such as travel time and distance to a clinical trial site can be a barrier to patient participation. The association of remote technology use and other decentralization tools that can reduce these barriers with likelihood to enroll in cancer trials is not well understood. Objective: To assess the association of remote technology and other decentralization tools used to reduce participation-related time and travel with the likelihood to enroll in cancer clinical trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between July 6 and September 8, 2021, a 41-question, cross-sectional, internet-based survey was administered to patients with cancer and survivors of cancer in the US who had been diagnosed with or treated for cancer in the past 7 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Increase in self-reported likelihood to enroll in cancer clinical trials that use remote technology and other decentralization tools to decrease the need for travel to the trial site. Results: There were 1183 survey respondents, with a mean (SD) age of 58.2 (12.5) years. Respondents self-reported their gender, race and ethnicity, cancer type, and treatment status. Of the 1183 respondents, 848 (72%) were female, 296 (25%) were male, 8 (1%) were other/nonbinary, and 31 (3%) declined to answer. With regard to race, 28 respondents (3%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, 25 (2%) were Asian, 234 (20%) were Black or African American, 20 (2%) were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, 825 (70%) were White, and 51 (4%) declined to answer. With regard to ethnicity, 115 respondents (10%) were Hispanic, Latino/Latina, or of Spanish origin, whereas 1017 (86%) were not and 51 (4%) declined to answer. Regarding cancer type and treatment status, 483 respondents (41%) either had or had survived breast cancer and 325 (28%) were being treated for cancer during the survey period. Individuals older than 55 years were more likely to say that they would only participate in trials no farther from their home than their regular care health care practitioner compared with younger respondents (26% vs 16%, respectively; P = .02). Higher-income earners (ie, those in households earning >$125 000/y) were significantly more likely than lower-income earners (ie, those in households earning <$70 000/y) to say they would participate in trials requiring additional effort (62% vs 41%, respectively; P = .03). If given the opportunity to enroll in a cancer clinical trial that required travel farther than their regular care, a majority of respondents (range, 60%-85%) indicated that they would be more likely to participate if the trial used remote technology and other tools to decrease the need for travel to a trial site. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, the survey findings suggest that cancer clinical trials leveraging remote technology and decentralization tools to reduce patient time and travel burden associated with participation may increase the patient consent rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.