Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35788532›Full record

ReviewSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2022

[Research progress on intelligent assessment system for upper limb function of stroke patients].

Sujiao Li, Kun Wu, Qiaoling Meng, Hongliu Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Multi-modal synergistic quantitative analysis and rehabilitation assessment of lower limbs for exoskeleton].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sujiao LiInstitute of Rehabilitation Engineering and Technology, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, P. R. China.
Kun WuInstitute of Rehabilitation Engineering and Technology, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, P. R. China.
Qiaoling MengInstitute of Rehabilitation Engineering and Technology, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, P. R. China.
Hongliu YuInstitute of Rehabilitation Engineering and Technology, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, the upper limb function of stroke patients is often assessed clinically using a scale method, but this method has problems such as time-consuming, poor consistency of assessment results, and high participation of rehabilitation physicians. To overcome the shortcomings of the scale method, intelligent upper limb function assessment systems combining sensors and machine learning algorithms have become one of the hot research topics in recent years. Firstly, the commonly used clinical upper limb functional assessment methods are analyzed and summarized. Then the researches on intelligent assessment systems in recent years are reviewed, focusing on the technologies used in the data acquisition and data processing parts of intelligent assessment systems and their advantages and disadvantages. Lastly, the current challenges and future development directions of intelligent assessment systems are discussed. This review is hoped to provide valuable reference information for researchers in related fields.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationAlgorithmsHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesUpper ExtremityFunction assessmentIntelligent evaluationMachine learningStrokeUpper limb

Identifiers

PMID35788532
PMCPMC10950765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.