Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35788472›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2022

Understanding the "Sometimes Masker": Political Orientation and Trust in the Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Syona Hariharan, Maydha Dhanuka, Natalie Kim, Arthur Rodriguez, Roopjote Atwal, Adam D Koon, Emily Mendenhall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Syona HariharanScience, Technology, and International Affairs Program, Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Maydha DhanukaScience, Technology, and International Affairs Program, Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Natalie KimScience, Technology, and International Affairs Program, Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Arthur RodriguezScience, Technology, and International Affairs Program, Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Roopjote AtwalDepartment of Biology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Adam D KoonDepartment of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Emily MendenhallScience, Technology, and International Affairs Program, Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. em1061@georgetown.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5826-1321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic in the United States has brought to light the problematic way partisan politics interferes with public health prevention and control measures. This study aims to investigate how Americans responded to the novel coronavirus with respect to their sociopolitical identity and masking habits. STUDY

designThis mixed-methods study incorporated three ethnographic projects and surveys together, from two rural areas (in Iowa and California) and one suburban community in California.

methodsWe interviewed 156 Americans about how masking habits related to six themes: participants' perceived risk level, concern for themselves and others, support for President Trump, trust in scientific organizations, and confidence in major news outlets. We conducted content analysis of qualitative interviews and evaluated survey questions to understand how and why people masked or engaged in public health prevention practices.

resultsGreater perceived risk, concern for others, and trust in health and media institutions was correlated with increased masking, while support for Trump was predictive of anti-masking sentiments. Participants who diverged from these trends, specifically those who sometimes wore masks, but not always were called "sometimes maskers". These sometimes maskers often identified as politically moderate and were more likely to mask due to concern for a vulnerable person or group in their lives.

conclusionsSince one in three Americans are political moderates, understanding what promotes their adherence to public health guidelines is essential for policy makers interested in pandemic containment. Relatedly, the conservative tendency to distrust mainstream media is what separated those who reported sometimes masking from those who reported always masking.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesTrustUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35788472
PMCPMC9255438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.