Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35788412›Full record

GuidelineClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2022

AGA Clinical Practice Update on New Technology and Innovation for Surveillance and Screening in Barrett's Esophagus: Expert Review.

V Raman Muthusamy, Sachin Wani, C Prakash Gyawali, Srinadh Komanduri, CGIT Barrett’s Esophagus Consensus Conference Participants

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
29.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06200961 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Use of Sedation-Free Transnasal Endoscopy to Improve Access and Lower Costs of Endoscopic Evaluations in a Bariatric Medical and Surgical Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorChristopher C. Thompson, MD, MScRan2026 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsObesity, Obesity, Morbid, Obese, GI DisordersArmsTransnasal Endoscopy, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
NCT07335445 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Enhancing Screening Practices for Barrett's Esophagus

TypeinterventionalSponsorRutgers, The State University of New JerseyRan2026 to 2029Enrolled3,000ConditionsBarrett's EsophagusArmsScreening Reminder
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cost effectiveness analysis of Barrett's esophagus screening: A systematic review.Best practice & research. Clinical gastroenterology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Prevalence of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma With and Without Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Screening for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: recent advances and next steps.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026
    Review
  12. High Rates of Dysplasia in a Population-Based Analysis of "Incidental" Barrett's Esophagus.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers for Barrett's Esophagus.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Pathogenesis of Barrett's Esophagus: Evolving and Emerging Mechanisms.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Emerging Biomarkers for Managing Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

V Raman MuthusamyVatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Sachin WaniDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado.
C Prakash GyawaliDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Srinadh KomanduriDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: koman1973@gmail.com.
CGIT Barrett’s Esophagus Consensus Conference Participants
Northwestern University · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Minimally Invasive Molecular Approaches for the Detection of Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal AdenocarcinomaR01CA241164 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Jagpreet Chhatwal, Prasad G. Iyer · 2019 to 2026
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA241164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

descriptionThe purpose of this best practice advice (BPA) article from the Clinical Practice Update Committee of the American Gastroenterological Association is to provide an update on advances and innovation regarding the screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus.

methodsThe BPA statements presented here were developed from expert review of existing literature combined with discussion and expert opinion to provide practical advice. Formal rating of the quality of evidence or strength of BPAs was not the intent of this clinical practice update. This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPUC and external peer review through standard procedures of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Screening with standard upper endoscopy may be considered in individuals with at least 3 established risk factors for Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma, including individuals who are male, non-Hispanic white, age >50 years, have a history of smoking, chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity, or a family history of BE or esophageal adenocarcinoma. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Nonendoscopic cell-collection devices may be considered as an option to screen for BE. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Screening and surveillance endoscopic examination should be performed using high-definition white light endoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy, with endoscopists spending adequate time inspecting the Barrett's segment. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Screening and surveillance exams should define the extent of BE using a standardized grading system documenting the circumferential and maximal extent of the columnar lined esophagus (Prague classification) with a clear description of landmarks and the location and characteristics of visible lesions (nodularity, ulceration), when present. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Advanced imaging technologies such as endomicroscopy may be used as adjunctive techniques to identify dysplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Sampling during screening and surveillance exams should be performed using the Seattle biopsy protocol (4-quadrant biopsies every 1-2 cm and target biopsies from any visible lesion). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Wide-area transepithelial sampling may be used as an adjunctive technique to sample the suspected or established Barrett's segment (in addition to the Seattle biopsy protocol). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Patients with erosive esophagitis should be biopsied when concern of dysplasia or malignancy exists. A repeat endoscopy should be performed after 8 weeks of twice a day proton pump inhibitor therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Tissue systems pathology-based prediction assay may be utilized for risk stratification of patients with nondysplastic BE. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Risk stratification models may be utilized to selectively identify individuals at risk for Barrett's associated neoplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Given the significant interobserver variability among pathologists, the diagnosis of BE-related neoplasia should be confirmed by an expert pathology review. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: Patients with BE-related neoplasia should be referred to endoscopists with expertise in advanced imaging, resection, and ablation. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: All patients with BE should be placed on at least daily proton pump inhibitor therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Patients with nondysplastic BE should undergo surveillance endoscopy in 3 to 5 years. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 15: In patients undergoing surveillance after endoscopic eradication therapy, random biopsies should be taken of the esophagogastric junction, gastric cardia, and the distal 2 cm of the neosquamous epithelium as well as from all visible lesions, independent of the length of the original BE segment.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProton Pump InhibitorsTechnologyProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35788412
PMCPMC10203866
OpenAlexW4283790380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.