ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023
Tailoring brain-machine interface rehabilitation training based on neural reorganization: towards personalized treatment for stroke patients.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Corticomuscular Connectivity and Brain Reorganization Post-Stroke.International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · 2025Article
- Multiscale brain modeling: bridging microscopic and macroscopic brain dynamics for clinical and technological applications.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
- EEG-based sensorimotor neurofeedback for motor neurorehabilitation in children and adults: A scoping review.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Enhancing Brain-Computer Interface Performance by Incorporating Brain-to-Brain Coupling.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Relation Between EEG Measures and Upper Limb Motor Recovery in Stroke Patients: A Scoping Review.Brain topography · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-machine interface (BMI) has the potential to enhance rehabilitation training efficiency, but it still remains elusive regarding how to design BMI training for heterogeneous stroke patients with varied neural reorganization. Here, we hypothesize that tailoring BMI training according to different patterns of neural reorganization can contribute to a personalized rehabilitation trajectory. Thirteen stroke patients were recruited in a 2-week personalized BMI training experiment. Clinical and behavioral measurements, as well as cortical and muscular activities, were assessed before and after training. Following treatment, significant improvements were found in motor function assessment. Three types of brain activation patterns were identified during BMI tasks, namely, bilateral widespread activation, ipsilesional focusing activation, and contralesional recruitment activation. Patients with either ipsilesional dominance or contralesional dominance can achieve recovery through personalized BMI training. Results indicate that personalized BMI training tends to connect the potentially reorganized brain areas with event-contingent proprioceptive feedback. It can also be inferred that personalization plays an important role in establishing the sensorimotor loop in BMI training. With further understanding of neural rehabilitation mechanisms, personalized treatment strategy is a promising way to improve the rehabilitation efficacy and promote the clinical use of rehabilitation robots and other neurotechnologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.