ReviewCancer cell international2022
Efficacy and safety of intravenous daratumumab-based treatments for AL amyloidosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Cancer cell international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum free light chain level-based and non-fixed cycle daratumumab treatment strategy for patients with light chain amyloidosis.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- A Dose-Tailored Anti-Plasma Cell Regimen Lowers the Mortality of Late-Stage Cardiac Amyloidosis.MedComm · 2025Article
- Successful Treatment with Daratumumab of a Patient with Monoclonal Lambda Light Chain Disease Presenting as Nephrotic Syndrome and Crescentic Glomerulonephritis.Acta haematologica · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular toxicity from therapies for light chain amyloidosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntravenous daratumumab (DARA IV) has been increasingly used in the treatment of amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis. However, the outcomes for patients administered with DARA IV have not been aggregated. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of DARA IV for AL amyloidosis.
methodsWe searched Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to 17 June 2021. Response rates and survival rates, and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled and calculated using a fixed-effects model.
resultsThirty studies (5 cohort studies and 25 single-arm studies) with 997 patients were included. In patients receiving DARA IV-based treatments, very good partial response or better response rate, complete response rate, very good partial response rate, partial response rate and overall response rate were 66% (95% CI, 62-69%), 30% (95% CI, 23-36%), 40% (95% CI, 33-46%), 17% (95% CI, 14-21%), and 77% (95% CI, 73-80%), respectively. Cardiac and renal responses were 41% (95% CI, 34-49%) and 43% (95% CI, 32-54%), respectively. 58% (95% CI, 49-66%) of patients achieved PFS one year or longer. 2.5% (range, 1-10.0%) of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events, of which the most common adverse event was lymphocytopenia (range, 13.6-25.0%).
conclusionThis study supports the efficacy and safety of DARA IV for the treatment of patients with AL amyloidosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.