Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35788194›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

A bioinformatic analysis study of m

Xinrui Wu, Chuanyu Li, Zhisu Wang, Yundi Zhang, Shifan Liu, Siqi Chen, Shuai Chen, Wangrui Liu, Xiaoman Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xinrui Wu *Department of oncology and chemotherapy, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Chuanyu Li *Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, China.
Zhisu Wang *Department of Clinical Medicine, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Yundi ZhangNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Shifan LiuDepartment of Medical imaging, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Siqi ChenDepartment of Medical imaging, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Shuai ChenDepartment of measurement and control technology and instruments, School of mechanical engineering, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Wangrui LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, China. cowdl@163.com.
Xiaoman LiuDepartment of oncology and chemotherapy, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China. 470504752@qq.com.
Nantong University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities · CNAffiliated Hospital of Nantong University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma is one of the most common brain cancers in adults, and is characterized by recurrence and little curative effect. An effective treatment for glioblastoma patients remains elusive worldwide. 7-methylguanosine (m7G) is a common RNA modification, and its role in tumors has become a research hotspot.

methodsBy searching for differentially expressed genes related to m7G, we generated a prognostic signature via cluster analysis and established classification criteria of high and low risk scores. The effectiveness of classification was validated using the Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) algorithm, and repeatedly verified using training and test groups. The dimension reduction method was used to clearly show the difference and clinical significance of the data. All analyses were performed via R (version 4.1.2).

resultsAccording to the signature that included four genes (TMOD2, CACNG2, PLOD3, and TMSB10), glioblastoma patients were divided into high and low risk score groups. The survival rates between the two groups were significantly different, and the predictive abilities for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were effective. We further established a Nomogram model to further examine the signature,as well as other clinical factors, with remaining significant results. Our signature can act as an independent prognostic factor related to immune-related processes in glioblastoma.

conclusionsOur research addresses the gap in knowledge in the m7G and glioblastoma research fields. The establishment of a prognostic signature and the extended analysis of the tumor microenvironment, immune correlation, and tumor mutation burden further suggest the important role of m7G in the development and development of this disease. This work will provide support for future research.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaAdultComputational BiologyDNA MethylationHumansTumor MicroenvironmentBiomarkersCancerHealth informaticsImmune infiltrationm7G methylationNeuroscienceRisk factorsSignature

Identifiers

PMID35788194
PMCPMC9251941
OpenAlexW4283816310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.