ArticleBMC cancer2022
A bioinformatic analysis study of m
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prolactin-Releasing Hormone Receptor (PRLHR) enhances radiosensitivity and exacerbates DNA damage in glioblastoma post-irradiation by inhibiting Y-box-binding protein-1 (YBX1) nuclear translocation: a novel perspective on precision radiotherapy.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Article
- RNA modifications: roles in immune cell biology and tumor regulation.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Development, validation, and updating of prognostic models for m7G-associated genes from TAMs in lower-grade gliomas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- RNA modifications in the tumor microenvironment: insights into the cancer-immunity cycle and beyond.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- TMOD2 and DOCK4 as Novel Gut Microbiota-Associated Biomarkers for Colorectal Adenoma: Integrated Transcriptomic Analysis and Therapeutic Target Identification.Mediators of inflammation · 2025Article
- tRNA Modifications and Dysregulation: Implications for Brain Diseases.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- Landscape of internal N7-methylguanosine of long non-coding RNA modifications in resistant acute myeloid leukemia.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Identification of PLOD3 and LRRN3 as potential biomarkers for Parkinson's disease based on integrative analysis.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
- Internal m7G methylation: A novel epitranscriptomic contributor in brain development and diseases.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023Review
- M7G-related molecular subtypes can predict the prognosis and correlate with immunotherapy and chemotherapy responses in bladder cancer patients.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- Identification and prediction of m7G-related Alzheimer's disease subtypes: insights from immune infiltration and machine learning models.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- m7G-related genes predict prognosis and affect the immune microenvironment and drug sensitivity in osteosarcoma.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Article
- Comprehensive pan-cancer analysis of N7-methylguanosine regulators: Expression features and potential implications in prognosis and immunotherapy.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlioblastoma is one of the most common brain cancers in adults, and is characterized by recurrence and little curative effect. An effective treatment for glioblastoma patients remains elusive worldwide. 7-methylguanosine (m7G) is a common RNA modification, and its role in tumors has become a research hotspot.
methodsBy searching for differentially expressed genes related to m7G, we generated a prognostic signature via cluster analysis and established classification criteria of high and low risk scores. The effectiveness of classification was validated using the Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) algorithm, and repeatedly verified using training and test groups. The dimension reduction method was used to clearly show the difference and clinical significance of the data. All analyses were performed via R (version 4.1.2).
resultsAccording to the signature that included four genes (TMOD2, CACNG2, PLOD3, and TMSB10), glioblastoma patients were divided into high and low risk score groups. The survival rates between the two groups were significantly different, and the predictive abilities for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were effective. We further established a Nomogram model to further examine the signature,as well as other clinical factors, with remaining significant results. Our signature can act as an independent prognostic factor related to immune-related processes in glioblastoma.
conclusionsOur research addresses the gap in knowledge in the m7G and glioblastoma research fields. The establishment of a prognostic signature and the extended analysis of the tumor microenvironment, immune correlation, and tumor mutation burden further suggest the important role of m7G in the development and development of this disease. This work will provide support for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.